Autonomous AI-Generated Artwork Cannot Be Copyrighted, Judge Rules
rollingstone.com
A new federal ruling states human authorship remains an "essential part of a valid copyright claim"
You are viewing a single comment
A new federal ruling states human authorship remains an "essential part of a valid copyright claim"
That hasn't been determined yet. A human prompt used by the AI to generate content might be enough to grant copyright. This case is about autonomous AI generated content.
A prompt is not sufficient, in fact some image copyrights were revoked from Kristina Kashtanova when it was revealed that her involvement in generating the images was limited to providing AI prompts.
She was only allowed to keep copyrights for work with more active involvement, namely text and layout.
Here's the Copyright Office's response for anyone interested.