Supreme Court rejects theory that would have meant radical changes to election rules

the_frumious_bandersnatch@programming.dev to Politics@beehaw.org – 48 points –
washingtonpost.com

In a 6-3 decision, SCOTUS rejected the notion that state legislatures have unlimited power to determine the rules for federal elections and draw partisan congressional maps without interference from state courts.

How much effect will this have on existing congressional maps and upcoming elections?

16

You are viewing a single comment

who were the 3 in the 6 v 3?

Alito, Gorsuch and Thomas. Gorsuch has occasionally surprised me. Alito and Thomas can always be counted on to be horrible.