Justifying one thing because it's a necessary component of another *unnecessary* thing... what logical fallacy is that?

SeahorseTreble@lemmy.world to Ask Lemmy@lemmy.world – 43 points –
124

You are viewing a single comment

when largely it is the majority),

how much veal do you think is made? how many pounds per calf? how many male calves are born a year? you're just wrong.

"Veal is meat, but it’s actually a cruel co-product of the dairy industry. If you consume dairy products you’re actually supporting the veal industry, too."

https://animalequality.org/blog/2019/08/14/dairy-industry-supports-veal-industry/

So, to my original point.

The veal industry is an unavoidable component of the dairy industry, as well as the slaughtering of cattle for beef, and a lot of other harmful practices to animals.

All of these practices are often justified (by some people) as a necessary component of dairy, while ignoring the fact that dairy itself isn't necessary, so therefore none of the practices within it are, either.

Hence, justifying one thing as a necessary component of another unnecessary thing.

it's not unavoidable. anyone could milk a cow without making veal.

On a mass scale to provide for everyone, it's necessary. However, for sake of example, just switch veal to beef. Or switch it to any of the other cruel practices inherent in dairy farming. The fallacy still applies if you defend one practice as a necessary component of a larger unnecessary practice