Justifying one thing because it's a necessary component of another *unnecessary* thing... what logical fallacy is that?SeahorseTreble@lemmy.world to Ask Lemmy@lemmy.world – 43 points – 11 months ago124Post a CommentPreviewYou are viewing a single commentView all commentsShow the parent commentAre you now trying to claim that animals don't have cognition despite the fact they're sentient and intelligent beings?i'm saying they are not cognizant of their personal mortality. if you can get me a cognitive-behavior paper that undercuts this, i'd love to read it.
Are you now trying to claim that animals don't have cognition despite the fact they're sentient and intelligent beings?i'm saying they are not cognizant of their personal mortality. if you can get me a cognitive-behavior paper that undercuts this, i'd love to read it.
i'm saying they are not cognizant of their personal mortality. if you can get me a cognitive-behavior paper that undercuts this, i'd love to read it.
Are you now trying to claim that animals don't have cognition despite the fact they're sentient and intelligent beings?
i'm saying they are not cognizant of their personal mortality. if you can get me a cognitive-behavior paper that undercuts this, i'd love to read it.