Substack says it will not remove or demonetize Nazi contenttardigrada@beehaw.org to Technology@beehaw.org – 197 points – 10 months agotheverge.com94Post a CommentPreviewYou are viewing a single commentView all commentsShow the parent commentIt's also disingenuous because they already decline to host sex workers newsletters. So if the censorship angle was true, they're already censoring.RIGHT. Thank you for pointing this out. ::: Right, and if the profit motive angle were true, they’re already violating that by censoring the sex workers you just mentioned. So that eliminates profit as the reason for their actions here
It's also disingenuous because they already decline to host sex workers newsletters. So if the censorship angle was true, they're already censoring.RIGHT. Thank you for pointing this out. ::: Right, and if the profit motive angle were true, they’re already violating that by censoring the sex workers you just mentioned. So that eliminates profit as the reason for their actions here
Right, and if the profit motive angle were true, they’re already violating that by censoring the sex workers you just mentioned. So that eliminates profit as the reason for their actions here
It's also disingenuous because they already decline to host sex workers newsletters. So if the censorship angle was true, they're already censoring.
RIGHT. Thank you for pointing this out.
:::
Right, and if the profit motive angle were true, they’re already violating that by censoring the sex workers you just mentioned.
So that eliminates profit as the reason for their actions here