Judge rules White House pressured social networks to “suppress free speech”
![](https://media.kbin.social/media/50/fa/50faafdc54426f200f4f2ff501c88f83b5721cbda5e946adf3404ae9cbc2dce5.gif)
![](https://media.kbin.social/media/28/8a/288a97a77d5193df968f8e692c98d29ac1843bdc6bedf7ad745d6439bf8e54cf.jpg)
![Judge rules White House pressured social networks to “suppress free speech”](https://forkk.me/pictrs/image/fa81ebf3-51a5-4722-ac02-b55f6757074a.jpeg?format=jpg&thumbnail=256)
arstechnica.com
A federal judge yesterday ordered the Biden administration to halt a wide range of communications with social media companies, siding with Missouri and Louisiana in a lawsuit that alleges Biden and his administration violated the First Amendment by colluding with social networks "to suppress disfavored speakers, viewpoints, and content."
You are viewing a single comment
Please repeat your claim, just so we're clear.
I am not making a claim. How are you so confused?
If you're making no claim, then how are we disagreeing?
Edit: This suggests some sort of claim you are making:
"Someone has to be, since we have conflicting claims."