rule 📏squirrel@lemmy.blahaj.zone to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zone – 361 points – 7 months ago57Post a CommentPreviewYou are viewing a single commentView all commentsSo the 1950's lass is wearing high heels. Without them she's probably a similar height to the first lass. Women's shoes in 1900 routinely had high heels as well. Here's a sample: https://vintagedancer.com/1900s/edwardian-shoes-styles/ The difference may be about an inch from the 1950s shoe shown.So, they are both smaller and there's a giant leap up to amazonian.
So the 1950's lass is wearing high heels. Without them she's probably a similar height to the first lass. Women's shoes in 1900 routinely had high heels as well. Here's a sample: https://vintagedancer.com/1900s/edwardian-shoes-styles/ The difference may be about an inch from the 1950s shoe shown.So, they are both smaller and there's a giant leap up to amazonian.
Women's shoes in 1900 routinely had high heels as well. Here's a sample: https://vintagedancer.com/1900s/edwardian-shoes-styles/ The difference may be about an inch from the 1950s shoe shown.So, they are both smaller and there's a giant leap up to amazonian.
So the 1950's lass is wearing high heels. Without them she's probably a similar height to the first lass.
Women's shoes in 1900 routinely had high heels as well. Here's a sample:
https://vintagedancer.com/1900s/edwardian-shoes-styles/
The difference may be about an inch from the 1950s shoe shown.
So, they are both smaller and there's a giant leap up to amazonian.