FCC chair: Speed standard of 25Mbps down, 3Mbps up isn’t good enough anymore
![](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/7c668ec0-a3ad-455f-b736-1f5f13808b09.png)
![](https://fry.gs/pictrs/image/c6832070-8625-4688-b9e5-5d519541e092.png)
![FCC chair: Speed standard of 25Mbps down, 3Mbps up isn’t good enough anymore](https://forkk.me/pictrs/image/80ec87ce-4e28-4b46-bde4-bcd7f4420e97.jpeg?format=jpg&thumbnail=256)
arstechnica.com
FCC chair: Speed standard of 25Mbps down, 3Mbps up isn’t good enough anymore::Chair proposes 100Mbps national standard and an evaluation of broadband prices.
You are viewing a single comment
well, if you have the money for it, you can get starlink, but its far from cheap. But since you are at cellular network, a 4G receiver with good placement can much improve on those speeds. I assume you are in some signal shadow, and swan never had too good coverage outside large cities... Maybe try some other operator ?
For 13EUR/month I sure could get faster speeds, but also fairly small data limits. Here I get 300GB/month.
Maybe the nearby cell towers are overloaded, I don't know. But at midnight it can go up to 45Mbps. The speed peaks around 2-3AM.
Also there's the free national roaming in Orange 2G/3G network. So if I really need faster internet speeds, I can use Orange 3G HSPA+ which is pretty reliable, although with 20GB/month cap.
Cellular is always overloaded in rural areas. Mobile ISPs always take on more customers than their infrastructure can handle.