LXD Maintainership Being Limited To Canonical EmployeesLeo@lemmy.linuxuserspace.show to Linux@lemmy.ml – 45 points – 12 months agophoronix.com13Post a CommentPreviewYou are viewing a single commentView all commentsVery sad. LXC/D is pretty good system level container, much safer/isolated than docker/podman and lighter than VMs@Gargari @leo You can still use LXC without LXD. I never used lxd since it’s pretty much snap only.It's packaged in non-Ubuntu distros (not that there's anything wrong with just using lxc)
Very sad. LXC/D is pretty good system level container, much safer/isolated than docker/podman and lighter than VMs@Gargari @leo You can still use LXC without LXD. I never used lxd since it’s pretty much snap only.It's packaged in non-Ubuntu distros (not that there's anything wrong with just using lxc)
@Gargari @leo You can still use LXC without LXD. I never used lxd since it’s pretty much snap only.It's packaged in non-Ubuntu distros (not that there's anything wrong with just using lxc)
Very sad. LXC/D is pretty good system level container, much safer/isolated than docker/podman and lighter than VMs
@Gargari @leo You can still use LXC without LXD. I never used lxd since it’s pretty much snap only.
It's packaged in non-Ubuntu distros (not that there's anything wrong with just using lxc)