Red Hat looking to hire a bootloader developer

pizzaiolo@slrpnk.net to Linux@lemmy.ml – 84 points –
Red Hat looking to hire a bootloader developer
theregister.com
22

You are viewing a single comment

Are there any machines in use anymore that don't support UEFI? When did it become standard? Something like 2012?

At my company, we have around 400,000 servers in production. When we last surveyed them, we found several thousand over 12 years old, with the oldest at 17 years. And that wasn’t counting our lab and admin servers which could run even older because they’re often repurposed from prod decomms.

We had a huge internal effort to virtualize their loads, but in the end, only about 15% were transferred just due to the sheer number of hidden edge cases that kept turning up.

How many of them would ever run an OS released in 2023?

All of them. Corp directive (now) is that hosts must be updated or reimaged every 90 days.

2014 is when a majority of new systems were UEFI, according to Wikipedia, but that's still a majority.

Intel announced in 2017 that by 2020 they're no longer gonna include BIOS support in their computers. So it could easily still pop up today, although it's not that likely to, since that support is for devices that can use either BIOS or UEFI.

Are there any machines in use anymore that don’t support UEFI?

As the article explains, the move is about VMs but IMO it would make more sense to improve UEFI support in VM solutions than this.