Music was better when ugly people were allowed to make it

Dr. Wesker@lemmy.sdf.org to Showerthoughts@lemmy.world – 627 points –
226

Someone forbade you to make music?

Way to dodge the point! Next lesson in mental gymnastics tutorial is blocking. Press X to continue.

Was this written by the cheapest, worst AI?

I hear it's amazing when the famous purple stuffed worm in flap-jaw space with the tuning fork does a raw blink on Hara-Kiri Rock. I need scissors! 61?

I'm certainly having trouble making sense of them.

Nah, ugly ppl still make the music, behind the scenes :p

Just about to comment this. Singers these days are usually the "face."

^ Uses 80s iconography to make fun of GenX's parents.

Isn't it ironic?

Depends if you ask a linguist or Alanis Morissette

Glad you caught the reference. Wouldn't it technically be irony in both cases?

Ugly people make music all the time.

You really gonna tell me Ed Sheeran is good looking? Post Malone?

But the contention is about music being better, and that's some bad music.

Did we read the same post?

Music was better when ugly people were allowed to make it

I guess your comment makes sense if you find those two attractive.

Like I get the boomer joke of music these days sucks but my comment was leaning into joke.

Your comment makes sense in the frame of "ugly people are allowed to make music," my comment refers to the "music was better" part of the post.

The ugly people you mentioned don't support your comment's argument against the original assertion because their music is terrible, not "better."

Some music sucked in the boomer's days, made by ugly and pretty people alike.

He’s simply disputing the assertion that ugly people aren’t allowed to make music.

Yeah, that's what the comment you replied to starts with.

Yeah so what’s your problem with what he said then?

Why did you reply to my comment to restate the first part of what I said?

I’ve never heard his music, but I think Post Malone is beautiful

Pop is just as manufactured and fake as it always was, with the exceptional trend setter or two doing their own thing, but what's just below the surface is always just as good as it always was.

As a fan of hardcore, electronica, folk, metal, and all of the genres that fall under them, I still get new bands. I still get new releases. I get cheap as fuck concerts and still get cool merch and awesome vinyls. I have zero to complain about. Hell, Primus, A Perfect Circle and Puscifer just made an album together, in 2024.

Anyone who says music sucks now doesn't really listen to that much music to start with. Music is just fine, man. Maybe look a little deeper than the pudding skin.

Those $10 dive bar bands are always the best

I have had a 50/50 success rates. The ones who are bad are REALLY bad. To make up for it, they crank the gain, volume, and distortion to 11 and just annihilate everyone’s eardrums.

Exactly. I wish these types of posts would change "music these days" to "pop these days" because that's what they're talking about.

It's debatable when pop actually began but pop as we know it really codified in the 80s with dawn of MTV and acts like Madonna and Michael Jackson. The Beatles, Rolling Stones, Queen, etc were popular but I wouldn't classify any of this as Pop. Pop has always been pretty people because it was by its nature tied to a visual medium.

People need to stop using Pop as a stand in for all music. We have more access to music than ever before and a lot of the music I listen to regularly, I have no idea what they look like.

I hear you and agree with much of that. I am a fan of multiple genres as well. But, as far as it goes for jazz, jazz is dead. Anyone still attempting to play it is often a sad version of what was once great in the 50s/60s/70s. So while there's plenty of music in other genres I like, always more to find from those time periods, as well as still enjoying the classics, it's a little upsetting good jazz is dead, modern jazz is trash, and people who think they know jazz these days actually refer to some other genre, like rock. Somewhat sad.

Have you checked out Live from Emmett's Place?

Live jazz streamed every week.

I have not. Thank you.

I definitely don't know where to look these days. I believe I was previously recommended SmallsLIVE, also on YT, but admittedly haven't spent much time there. https://youtube.com/@smallslive?si=b4mxAHP1xqxv7QNm

I've also been listening to Avishai Cohen, a bassist, for the past many years, who has modern things and may still be active. Jazz is just not mainstream in any way anymore. And most people don't know what it is.

Jazz, to me, a layman to the genre comes off as anything from Miles Davis and Duke Ellington to soundtracks composed for animes, to progressive epics that span twenty minutes and spin into a free form improv that's somewhere between art and math.

But aside from it being a flavor other things come in, like a jazzy rock band, Mars Volta or a jazzy metal band, like Opeth, or a jazzy singer, like Michael Buble, I don't know jazz.

I don't think as a normal person that I'm exposed to pure "jazz", whatever it dilutes into, but I'm fascinated by the chance that there might be something I'm missing that you might mention.

I suppose I don't know a ton. My earliest entry was that of Buddy Rich, the drummer. As a drummer, I wanted to relate. Play fast and all. Haha. Though my playing has all but ceased (the stomach drum and desk drum will always live on!), my love for his often high tempo pieces lives on. He played songs I believe others played as well. His versions were just more upbeat!

I'll give you an example of a group I didn't like all that much and that was the Glen Miller Orchestra. Even as a jazz fan I can hear the style of jazz people refer to when they talk about "music to put you to sleep."

But BR was just the beginning. It sounds like you know more than most believe it or not. Miles is great and I think I have more to discover there even.

The latest artist I found, new to me, also from the 50s/60s I believe, is Bill Evans, a pianist. It was a YouTube comment I came across that mentioned Evans to now be their "piano daddy" and from what I'm hearing, I'd have to agree. 😁 But, again, I only know so much. (Talk as if I know it all though...)

Buddy Rich was good for his time and influential and all that, but the instrument has evolved so far since then.

Check out Matt Gartska and a band called Animals as Leaders for a great modern jazz drummer.

The first song that came up for me on YT by him was Physical Education. There's a lot of rock in there. He reminds me somewhat of a Dave Weckl or Carter Beauford even. Some of the instrument's evolution I'm not interested in.

Google classifies Animals as Leaders as a progressive metal band...

Awful take. Last weekend I saw Mike Dillon with Phunkadelick playing with Brian Haas on the Rhodes organ. They played a wild punk-jazz show that is one of the best shows I've ever attended. There was a mosh pit at a jazz concert where a primary instrument was a vibraphone.

In recent years, I've greatly enjoyed things like AKU!'s album Blind Fury (drum/trumpet/baritone sax trio) and Ambrose Akinmusire's Origami Harvest. A lot of modern jazz is blending in electronic influences, like Sungazer. Maybe you don't like these things, but I can't imagine calling jazz dead.

I'm not sure that's jazz anymore, but maybe I have more to learn. I wouldn't go to a jazz concert with a mosh pit. The two don't go together.

Isn't the core of jazz improvisation and breaking the "rules" of music? If that's what they're doing, why would we disqualify it as jazz? A lot of folks had this opinion of Miles Davis doing jazz fusion in the 70s on Bitches Brew and Live/Evil with his squeaky, borderline abusive trumpeting, or of Herbie Hancock doing weird space synth stuff on Sextant and funk fusion on Headhunters. I don't see how what you're saying isn't just gatekeeping that's not really in the spirit of jazz.

Yea that's why metal fuckin rules. We got the ugliest guys ever altogether in one room and said "what you got?" and they became legends

And for anyone that might say that doesn't happen anymore, I ask: how many open mic nights or $20 shows have you been to lately? The scene is doing great in my area, but it doesn't happen by magic. Ya gotta support it, spread the word, bring your friends.

More of a hardcore guy myself but we're equally as ugly so I stand in solidarity

Yeah, no kidding. I just bought tickets for a $15 show that has multiple bands and included a overseas band. I mentioned to them that they should’ve upped the prices to $20.

Also: Sturgeon‘s law still applies: “90% of everything is crap“. Music is so amazingly easy to make these days you can do it on your phone (and I believe a Grammy nominated/winning album did so). Which means that there are literally thousands of albums every year, And so there will be a lot of crap. But between Bandcamp and Spotify and SoundCloud (and so on, even self-hosting), this is the freaking plutonium age if you like new music. There is literally so much that you can’t possibly keep up with it, even in sub genres. And there are some amazing gems coming out daily

Most of my favorite artists are beautiful tho… Mikael Akerfeldt, Alexi Laiho (RIP), Devin Townsend, Shagrath…

I also thought Alexi was hot, but I've never heard anyone else say that until now.

Also Tosin Abasi (founder of Animals as Leaders), but I'd be shocked if anyone said he isn't attractive.

Edit: some pics and tunes.

Alexi Laiho, lead singer of Children of Bodom:

Lake Bodom (youtube): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZtmFh-2CJ7A

Tosin Abasi, guitarist of Animals as Leaders:

CAFO (youtube): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q0ZrF7taMHA

Alexi was sooooo hawt.

Also fuck yeah, how could I forget Tosin?!

Dudes with long hair can get a real vibe. Francesco Paoli (Fleshgod Apocalypse) also nails it I think:

And in usual fashion, here's a very cool song and music video. Sugar (youtube): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xmq3iyW02b8

First heard of Fleshgod when I saw The Black Dahlia Murder live. Nobody knew who they were, so they just walked up on stage, yelled "We are from the Italy!" and then went straight into playing. Such a great show.

He’s… beautiful…

Thank you for the new artist!

"Ugly" people still make music but apparently you don't listen to it. Shameful, tbh.

Ugly people are still have always been making it, pop acts have just make a pretty person pretend to sing it it sells better.

I am convinced that producers go out with a company checkbook and standard boilerplate, find acts that have good songs, then buy the rights to those songs.

They then give the songs to larger pop artists and never credit the original artist because there is no need. They likely pay well for a decent song.

They do.
It's extremely rare that people like Taylor Swift get as big as she is from writing her own songs.

There are actual classes you can take on how to write pop songs, taught by people who made pop artists big.

One of the biggest examples of this for me was " even if it breaks your heart". I was pretty happy hearing a pop country song with decent lyrics, to find out it was written by Will Hoge and Eli Young Band bought the rights.

just figured out, what? pop has always been pretty people...

This is the kind of boomer post you make if you haven't followed music in 20 years.

Why is it that most manufactured pop from before you were born still sounds good, but most manufactured pop after your 40s sounds irritating as fuck? Like, I could dig some “Charleston” from the 1920s but Ashley Simpson is barf-o-rama.

"music was better when..."

Any version of this makes the speaker sound suuuper old and bitter. 😂

My highschool music is better than your highschool music!

Nah, generally yes, but this particular follow up is hilarious. When ugly people made it haha

At least he doesnt like all newer music simply because the artist look better.

I had a luthier tell me how much was much better before the record. How artists would perform live and have to do their best in these performances.

Once records came around all the artists sold out and it has been downhill from there.

“Ok, can I have my guitar back, please…”

tbh we are all just snapshots of ourselves at different stage of the same cycle. The Simpsons did a whole thing about lolapalooza which starts with homer looking for his favourite artists in a record store, and the record store dude, and being directed to the oldies section.

The bands that feature in that episode are the smashing pumpkins, soundgarden , cypress Hill and Peter Frampton, all of whom appear in Spotify old school lists

Oh sure, everything new becomes old eventually, that's just how time works. I'm more poking fun at those who let their nostalgia determine what is worthwhile.

ugly people aren't allowed to make music anymore?

well fuck me then.

its why ed sheeran was killed he made music

F in chat for ed sheeran, and ugly ugly man, who made not very good music, but was loved by, some people.

it was hilarious seeing him on game of thrones. my buddy told me in one of the next episodes id see someone id recognize and i never thought itd be him 😂

he was in game of thrones? When? Can we blame the downfall on him now? lol.

It's a throwaway scene of some Lannister troops around a campfire. Arya and The Hound walk up. It has no bearing on the story, it's just a cameo. Ditto with the guy from Coldplay that's in the band during the Red Wedding.

Literally the first person I thought of when reading the title of this post

Lol, do you think only pop star music exist? It's actually the contrary that happend. Now, more than ever, anyone can make music. This is a really bad take.

I think the actual take is probably closer to "I wish we went back to a time when record companies would take a bet on anyone, regardless of the overall package, looks etc"

Which tbh, is probably more of a fairy tale view of years olden days than anything else.

What do you mean? there are plenty of British recording artists

Yeah no, that's just a cranky old guy thought. Just today I was watching fairly average looking people promoting music on late shows. You're probably getting a very thin slice of pop music and ignoring everything else (and hell, even pop breaks that rule sometimes).

Plus, physical beauty and music are both subjective. I try to not get all "old man yells at cloud" about how music "used to be better".

Tbf, I think radio absolutely used to be better before iheart and their ilk bought fucking everything and turned every goddamn station into a hypersanitized prepackaged mix of the same 10 bloody songs over and over. Therefore, by extension, I could 100% see how someone basing their opinion on what actually gets radio play could easily arrive at the conclusion that music is worse now.

I'm very lucky to have an independent radio station in my area. It's run by a nearby college, but they let anyone take training to become a host.

They don't always play music I like (hell, they don't always even play music) but I'll deal with 30 minutes of buddhist chanting because the variety can't be beaten. Also, they have no ad breaks.

Oh man, my independent station is wild sometimes. It swaps between a lot of genres, from punk to classical. They played an Earthbound video game cover once, even. My npr station is relatively fine too.

Corpos 100% ruin radio, though, and that's been true for a long time. Stations often get incentives to pay the same songs and that's only gotten worse with time. True across all popular genres, too.

I think music staring going downhill when music was no longer an audio only thing. Once bands were expected to make videos, posters, and "act" on stage, suddenly a lot of musicians had problems getting into the business. They want to make music, not become pseudo-actors.

So you're saying that.... video killed the radio star..?

And even before MTV, there were these bands. So called “performers” even. It’s almost as if they performed some kind of act to entertain an audience.

Metal and grunge still happened in a music video era.

I think a bigger thing that happened was the collapse of the CD. From that point, the new acts that the industry seemed to focus on were individuals instead of groups.

Video killed the radio star

God, the irony of MTV playing this as their very first music video.

Podcasts are literally a thing

Podcasts are not what this song is about at all. You are not totally incorrect though, podcasts are similar to radio.

Not really related to that stupid boomer post, but ho crazy is it that that ugly british lady won music star or popstar or whatever and everyone was like: oh my god this is insane, ugly people can do things? They are almost like real people.

Susan Boyle?

Beauty is, of course, in the eye of the beholder, but this is Richard Goodall. He's a school janitor in my town of Terre Haute, Indiana and he just won America's Got Talent. He will probably have at least a somewhat successful musical career after this. He really blew people away.

I don't think music has gotten any worse. However, it is much easier and cheaper to produce music today: you don't have to be able to play an instrument and professional production is possible with comparatively inexpensive software on any standard computer. This and also the changes in distribution (no more need for sound carriers, ...) have probably led to a lot more music being produced today than in the past. Of course, this does not mean that music has become better as a result, but it also does not mean that it has become worse. You just have to find the gems among the admittedly gigantic amount of junk.

I somewhat disagree.

Music seems like it's followed a similar trajectory of most things where it's become more centralized and mass marketed. Music has to appeal to the masses for studios to pick it up. So there is an incentive to find music that appeals to the most people and turns off the fewest.

Similarly, you have a handful of studios telling you what is "good" and pushing it. Even if it isn't great, it's good enough that people listen and then they can create the hype behind it where it might not organically exist.

Some music bubbles up organically from independent artists but quite a bit is mass marketed and produced by big studios. And they have the money so they can choke out smaller artists.

I think there's a categorical difference between pop and indie music and you're right about the increased centralization of pop music, however the increased ease of music production and distribution has also lead to a greater proliferation of indie music at the same time

Well, in that regard not too much changed, I think. Record labels always mostly pushed music and artists with mass appeal. They still do but have lost a lot of their power to companies like Spotify, Apple and Google (YouTube). But these players do pretty much the same with their algorithms. So I don't think that popular music has changed too much. There are still influential companies that can pretty much dictate what people listen to. I still don't think it has become much worse, since back in the day you weren't even able to produce an album without a record deal because studio time, distribution and all that was so expensive. Today you can produce everything yourself in your bedroom. Sure, it's unlikely that you will be very successful marketing your record - but at least it's somewhat possible.

Ah yes, ugly singers like:

Elvis Presley
Frank Sinatra
John Bon Jovi
Freddie Mercury
Aretha Franklin

Indie labels still allow ugly people on stage!

Pop / major label's job is more on the money side than the music. We don't see ugly people in adverts either.

Music was better when I used to look at the back of an album and the credits were like a dozen people. I'm sorry to people who like Beyonce, Gaga etc. But you look at their albums and they have hundreds of writers, engineers, producers, mixers, etc. What do these celebrities actually do anymore? Just show up and read the lines and the crew takes care of the rest? I'm sorry but that to me isn't a good artist or musician, that's just manufactured branding.

They aren't even ugly, they're just beautiful in a different way than media accepts.

Imagine how much less beautiful the world would be if this face weren’t allowed to succeed

"Ugly" and "good music" are subjective

That's not the question. Do you think music nowadays puts more emphasis on the appearance of the artist than before? Idk what it is but I find reactions like this annoying. Like OP makes a good point and then we have to hear a lot of 'well, actually' bs.

Do you think music nowadays puts more emphasis on the appearance of the artist than before?

I think the question is backwards. What we have isn't a prioritization of appearance but a reduction of advertised talent combined with a professionalization of cosmetics. When you've consecrated your industry around a bare handful of performers, you can pick out the fist full of people that check every box.

Beyonce, Swift, Usher, and Bieber cover all the bases.

But once you get outside that rarified niche of promoted talent? Do you really think Post Malone is famous for his good looks? Is Kishi Bashi just coasting on his pretty face?

I don't really think so.

Attractive people get more opportunities in life, it's baked into our brains. I prefer looking at attractive people. Music is something we hear, but with digital and social media it's as much seen as it is heard. More artists are coming up through tik tok now than the radio. This relationship shows that being attractive will improve a persons odds of being successful in music. Maybe if personality can shine through in those videos it can overtake appearance.

More artists are coming up through tik tok now than the radio.

The radio isn't a thousand independent stations looking to fill air time with local talent, it's a handful of mega-monoliths looking to maximize advertising revenue with the Most Popular Thing (that fits the corporate agenda).

This relationship shows that being attractive will improve a persons odds of being successful in music.

Blandly conventionally attractive, to boot. Could we even do Amy Winehouse in the modern moment? Could we see Eminem or Maryl Manson or Buddy Holly or Ray Charles or Billie Holiday topping the charts? Idfk anymore. Seems like it's easier than ever to blacklist anyone who is even remotely controversial. Plenty of attractive people who will do the Brittany Spears thing for fear of being the next Dixie Chicks.

Maybe if personality can shine through in those videos it can overtake appearance.

Unfortunately, the personality that shines brightest seems to be the kind that singles you're an asshole.

Just ask P Diddy and Kanye.

pretty sure that's how hyperpop happened 10 years ago

Hit me with your best music recommendations from ugly people.

kimya dawson and left at london

(i think these people are gorgeous, for the purposes of this rhetoric I am basing this perception on hollywood norms)

I don't like calling people ugly but Hobo Johnson looks like a homeschooler who had his lunch money bullied from him

Listen to ugly people music (or vtuber music, same thing (na, just kidding around with vtuber insecurities (help I'm trapped inside this nested parenthesis))) nevermind, got out.

Are you calling vtubers ugly?

Oh no! You've got trapped in the first level of nested parenthesis! To get out, you need to go down two levels to where I was trapped, and here's the tricky part, you have to make sure you leave with the correct number of parenthesis and then you are out ok.

Isn't this extremely genre dependent? And regardless, this has been going on for a long time.

The Supremes? Good looking gals (and great music IMHO).

Grateful Dead? Sure, rough around the edges.

The Doors? Um...ever seen a picture of Jim Morrison? Dude would make Derek Zoolander blush.

Out of curiosity, I asked Spotify for modern metal music, and I got The Black Dahlia Murder --- frontman looks like a regular dude who I'd grab a beer with.

Yeah, modern pop places a ton of emphasis on looks, sure. But I think this has been pretty prominent in music for a very long time, be it the airbrushed R&B of the sixties, the androgynous glam of the eighties, or the metro sexual (guy)/model-esque looks of modern pop.

Beauty is also within the eye of the beholder, many forget this.

My first proper boyfriend was very attractive to me, because he resembled Jarvis from Pulp. Not everyone's cup of tea, yet I found that look very attractive.

Marcus King ROCKS and he is not good looking. Charismatic as fuck on stage too.

I think there is about the same proportion of good music to bad as there ever was, you just don't hear the bad music of the past because it didn't last. Survival bias, I think it's called.

For sure, as a teenager - interest in music switched from interest in music to finding music videos that got girls in 'em'.

What the fuck happened to your formatting

These?. Yup, wrap text in these for code formatting -> `

You can also
Do multiple
Lines
By wrapping with three of those  consecutively

Like this -> ```

No I mean why are some of your words different colors

That's just how your client formats code blocks. I'm using Connect and inline code blocks have red text

I'm on the website.

K, so the web client. I just checked out the website and it looks like it's coloring words that tend to be common tokens in programming languages, like "if" and "with". That wasn't me applying the colors, that was your client, I just wrapped text in " ` " or " ``` “. The actual comment is just Markdown formatting

Ohhhh that makes sense. Programming words. Thanks, I didn't register it

I make music but I'll never perform it for people that judge music by appearance.

Music is better when you listen to what brings you joy and stop caring about the physical appearance of the artist.

I'd like to thank this thread for reminding me to check out some new music. Just today, I have discovered MJ Lenderman and Still House Plants who both seem to be doing some cool stuff that's right up my alley. There's a new Mogwai track released a few days back and Sumac just released an amazing sludge metal album, even though I'm not really into sludge, it might convert me. A quick few image searches shows me that none of them are particularly attractive. Music has always been, and always will be awesome regardless of the physical appeal of the lead singers.

That's true!!! Ugly people are talented.

Don't ask me how I know...

I got a 30 day ban on Facebook for posting this in a meme. It was the change my mind guy

Ed Sheeran seems to be doing alright

Ugly might be a strong word. Definitely not conventionally attractive though.

Nonsense. Anyone can make music if they want to and are able to.

Edit: okay I hate having to ask this, but why the downvotes?

I just saw the dudes from Streetlight Manifesto and they're definitely not lookers. And they're getting SO OLD

They aren't old, they're right around my age!

Shit

Dude, Mike Brown has a huge fringe of white hair on his beard and Jim Conti has a beer gut and a dad bod.

No hate because I've got all three but damn does it make me feel like 2007 was a long damn time ago.