Andrew Tate prosecution files reveal graphic claims of coercion ahead of trial
bbc.com
Warning: This lengthy article contains disturbing language and details of graphic evidence.
You are viewing a single comment
Warning: This lengthy article contains disturbing language and details of graphic evidence.
You clearly spent 30-40 years researching nonsense if those are the unsupported conclusions you reached. I don't think the few minutes wasted on this conversation is the real concern.
You have invented woo-based flights of fancy that have no basis in reality and which are entirely unsupported. Label them metaphysical, spiritual, or religious if you'd like. Can you test you hypothesis regarding consciousness or sine waves? Can it be measured or demonstrated? Your comments seem to indicate that it cannot, and if you cannot support it with evidence, why do you believe it?
Your entire epistemology can be summed up with "I'd like to believe that...". May I suggest instead...empiricism? Otherwise my idea that the entire universe is made of tiny invisible dragons that are the basis of reality while also existing outside of space and time and breathing cold fire and pooping out black holes is equally reasonable. I mean, I just feel that it's true, and you would too if you weren't so damned close minded. After all, space is cold, black holes exist and you don't see the dragons... The evidence is everywhere!
I didn't invent any of this. I parsed it for your benefit in a goddamn forum post. Your lack of understanding is your own problem. Blocked.
No one said you invented woo, but you subscribe to it. Nothing you said in any of your posts was ever actual evidence though.