No web browser offers a good out of the box experience.

Linux@lemmy.ml – 98 points – 1 years ago

I feel like there is no web browser with a sane default configuration that I can recommend to other people. All browsers are preconfigured in a way that harms the privacy of their users or include services that no one wants such as Pocket and BAT.

Here are my problems with some popular browsers.

Mozilla Firefox: Pocket integration, no ad-blocking without extensions.
Brave: Everything related to crypto. Also its start page is horrible.
Chromium: No ad-blocking without extensions and soon Manifest v3 will cripple all content blockers.

Now, these suboptimal defaults wouldn't be such a big problem if the configuration files were easy to backup and restore and respected the XDG base directory specification.

You are viewing a single comment

View all comments Show the parent comment

Can confirm, I only configured some visual changes, font, minimal font size and alike.

Only problem I have with it is, an increasing number of webpages tell me, my browser is outdated and rarely some pages don't work correctly.

I am thinking of moving to Epiphany (gnome-web) some day, but I may start missing the vim-like interaction with qutebrowser.

Have you updated Qutebrowser recently? It was running a pretty ancient version of Chromium under the hood before the 3.0 release (2 weeks ago), but it’s up-to-date now.

Thx for the reminder; I need to do that update.

you might be able to fix webpages telling you you're outdated by changing your useragent string.

I am thinking of moving to Epiphany (gnome-web) some day, but I may start missing the vim-like interaction with qutebrowser.

There's a WebKitGTK-based web browser called Luakit. Pretty good from my experience, although webkit can be problematic at times.