Longer term updates aren't a big deal when the hardware gets replaced in a corporate environment.
Still, I fail to see the point of running android on a desktop vs. chromeOS, Windows, or even linux; which get decades of updates, and have desktop apps supported natively for all your workflow. How or rather why would anyone get this instead of buying one of those. What android apps would you run on a large screen anyway?
I agree there. That's the part I'm wondering about.
Most corporations are vastly reducing the cadence at which they replace hardware, given that new hardware lifecycles are much longer both in terms of reliability of the hardware and the performance compared to newer hardware.
Longer term updates aren't a big deal when the hardware gets replaced in a corporate environment.
Still, I fail to see the point of running android on a desktop vs. chromeOS, Windows, or even linux; which get decades of updates, and have desktop apps supported natively for all your workflow. How or rather why would anyone get this instead of buying one of those. What android apps would you run on a large screen anyway?
I agree there. That's the part I'm wondering about.
Most corporations are vastly reducing the cadence at which they replace hardware, given that new hardware lifecycles are much longer both in terms of reliability of the hardware and the performance compared to newer hardware.