Pawoo, a Japanese Mastadon instance on the Fediverse notoriously bad about moderating CSAM, has been taken down.Hal-5700X@lemmy.world to Fediverse@lemmy.world – 238 points – 12 months ago https://archive.ph/jneKS https://archive.ph/rIwQq 26Post a CommentPreviewYou are viewing a single commentView all commentsShow the parent commentNah. They're lax about loli. Which, as distasteful as it is, does not involve any harm to actual children. They do go after actual CSAM.They didn't bother outlawing possession of CP until 2014 https://edition.cnn.com/2014/06/17/world/asia/japan-child-porn-law Distribution was legal right up until 1999 Under the new law, people in possession of child pornography have one year to dispose of it before they risk prosecution. Very considerate!Not really, they’re lax about CSAM and didn’t even have laws until 2016-2017. Even then the laws are laxThey go after it mainly to appease external forces like other countries objecting to it, but people who are convicted often get very light sentences.
Nah. They're lax about loli. Which, as distasteful as it is, does not involve any harm to actual children. They do go after actual CSAM.They didn't bother outlawing possession of CP until 2014 https://edition.cnn.com/2014/06/17/world/asia/japan-child-porn-law Distribution was legal right up until 1999 Under the new law, people in possession of child pornography have one year to dispose of it before they risk prosecution. Very considerate!Not really, they’re lax about CSAM and didn’t even have laws until 2016-2017. Even then the laws are laxThey go after it mainly to appease external forces like other countries objecting to it, but people who are convicted often get very light sentences.
They didn't bother outlawing possession of CP until 2014 https://edition.cnn.com/2014/06/17/world/asia/japan-child-porn-law Distribution was legal right up until 1999 Under the new law, people in possession of child pornography have one year to dispose of it before they risk prosecution. Very considerate!
Not really, they’re lax about CSAM and didn’t even have laws until 2016-2017. Even then the laws are lax
They go after it mainly to appease external forces like other countries objecting to it, but people who are convicted often get very light sentences.
Nah. They're lax about loli. Which, as distasteful as it is, does not involve any harm to actual children. They do go after actual CSAM.
They didn't bother outlawing possession of CP until 2014 https://edition.cnn.com/2014/06/17/world/asia/japan-child-porn-law Distribution was legal right up until 1999
Very considerate!
Not really, they’re lax about CSAM and didn’t even have laws until 2016-2017. Even then the laws are lax
They go after it mainly to appease external forces like other countries objecting to it, but people who are convicted often get very light sentences.