Seeding resource usage
I know ideally you seed as much as you can, but I’m curious how much extra resources (memory, cpu, etc) each additional torrent you seed uses? I don’t mind the storage being used, but the box I have all my torrents on isn’t the most powerful and I’m nearing 100 torrents seeding and am a little concerned it may bottleneck the other stuff running at one point. Most aren’t actively seeding all the time, they just occasionally contribute here and there.
You are viewing a single comment
I seed several thousand torrents that compose over 50 TB of content, and qBittorrent barely uses 1-2 gigs of RAM. It uses that little even though I set the max usage to 5gb. As far as the processor goes, that barely gets touched unless I’m doing maintenance and need to recheck the files, in which case my CPU usage hovers around 5% or less. Honestly, the thing that gets the most action from qBittorrent is simply the hard disk. I found the recheck goes faster if I set it to just one at a time so that the disk doesn’t bottleneck—the CPU and RAM will already be more than enough, even on a mid tier machine.
Now Plex on the other hand, that bad boy can max out a CPU like nobody’s business if the settings are right, but since upgrading to a Ryzen 9, even “make my CPU hurt” won’t take it above 80%.
So basically, the torrenting is pretty low footprint, but serving torrented content for streaming, especially when transcoding is involved, can be much more resource intensive.
Under 2gigs for 7.5k, what’s some of your settings for connection limits and max active?
I have qBit too with about 30TB and currently 2.5k torrents. I average maybe 5MB/s.
I’ve honestly had the best performance just leaving connections and max active at unlimited. I’ve read a lot of suggestions about limiting it for increased upload speed, but I have never seen the benefit when I’ve tried it.
If you want transcoding then you want an Intel processor as their iGPUs can handle plenty of streams without breaking a sweat.
I’m just partial to AMD, and honestly the Ryzen 9 has absolutely blown my mind. That thing chews through 4k like nothing and barely breaks 100 degrees.
Ok damn that’s reassuring. I’m running Plex too and I’m sure that’s using much more cpu. Luckily don’t have a ton of users so hopefully never too much. I’ve debated having a second smaller pc that just does the Plex hosting and transcoding and leave the other box as just a NAS