[META] Never change, lemmy.mlThorny_Insight@lemm.ee to Mildly Infuriating@lemmy.world – 205 points – 8 months agoi.imgur.comFor context: The thread was about why people hate Hexbear and Lemmygrad instances290Post a CommentPreviewYou are viewing a single commentView all commentsShow the parent comment"Eat the rich" doesn't mean it literally.Yes, I know, but what do you expect me to say when you don't respond to any of my other arguments?Disagreeing with your arguments is not the same as not responding to them.Okay, but you outright ignored my argument about taxing everything over $1 billion and just went back to parroting “eat the rich” instead.
"Eat the rich" doesn't mean it literally.Yes, I know, but what do you expect me to say when you don't respond to any of my other arguments?Disagreeing with your arguments is not the same as not responding to them.Okay, but you outright ignored my argument about taxing everything over $1 billion and just went back to parroting “eat the rich” instead.
Yes, I know, but what do you expect me to say when you don't respond to any of my other arguments?Disagreeing with your arguments is not the same as not responding to them.Okay, but you outright ignored my argument about taxing everything over $1 billion and just went back to parroting “eat the rich” instead.
Disagreeing with your arguments is not the same as not responding to them.Okay, but you outright ignored my argument about taxing everything over $1 billion and just went back to parroting “eat the rich” instead.
Okay, but you outright ignored my argument about taxing everything over $1 billion and just went back to parroting “eat the rich” instead.
"Eat the rich" doesn't mean it literally.
Yes, I know, but what do you expect me to say when you don't respond to any of my other arguments?
Disagreeing with your arguments is not the same as not responding to them.
Okay, but you outright ignored my argument about taxing everything over $1 billion and just went back to parroting “eat the rich” instead.