By actually distributing the value generated to the workers. It doesn't require the state to do anything except legislate paying workers their worth. Adequately taxing those with means to pay for social services for those without. You know, actually benefitting the lowest rung of the social hierarchy beyond letting them beg for scraps and die.
I'll give you a hint, no one is being paid what they're worth while a profit margin exists because every dollar of profit is a dollar exploited from the supplier, the worker, and the customer, for the benefit of the mini kings of capitalism.
That's not giving the means of production, that's just giving the benefits of production
Which if you knew how to read a book you'd realise is the point. Like I said, you're not pretending to be a moron. You're just parroting shit you heard elsewhere with no understanding of it's actual meaning or context, and you've definitely never read any of the books these ideas come from. You are the equivalent of a child telling a physicist that they don't know how particle physics works because of what your friend told you in kindergarten.
Go read a book and stop being a willfully ignorant dumbass. Not that I have any hope you'd understand the concepts in them but you'd have to learn something from osmisis at least.
You're telling me that while parroting "seize the means of production" when you only seem to want to abolish positive balances
By actually distributing the value generated to the workers. It doesn't require the state to do anything except legislate paying workers their worth. Adequately taxing those with means to pay for social services for those without. You know, actually benefitting the lowest rung of the social hierarchy beyond letting them beg for scraps and die.
I'll give you a hint, no one is being paid what they're worth while a profit margin exists because every dollar of profit is a dollar exploited from the supplier, the worker, and the customer, for the benefit of the mini kings of capitalism.
That's not giving the means of production, that's just giving the benefits of production
Which if you knew how to read a book you'd realise is the point. Like I said, you're not pretending to be a moron. You're just parroting shit you heard elsewhere with no understanding of it's actual meaning or context, and you've definitely never read any of the books these ideas come from. You are the equivalent of a child telling a physicist that they don't know how particle physics works because of what your friend told you in kindergarten.
Go read a book and stop being a willfully ignorant dumbass. Not that I have any hope you'd understand the concepts in them but you'd have to learn something from osmisis at least.
You're telling me that while parroting "seize the means of production" when you only seem to want to abolish positive balances