Texas woman who sought court permission for abortion leaves state for the procedure, attorneys say

negativenull@startrek.website to politics @lemmy.world – 292 points –
Texas woman who sought court permission for abortion leaves state for the procedure, attorneys say
apnews.com
58

You are viewing a single comment

Same. Unfortunately, the John Lewis Voting Rights Act was less important than centrists' adherence to the Jim Crow Filibuster.

Floridians had rights, until suddenly they didn't.

Rights aren't so important when they can easily taken away.

Rights aren't important to you at all. As long as Democrats get to keep their stupid procedural excuse for inaction, everything else is secondary.

And yet they are taking action where they can, like in Ohio, Kansas, etc.

You are willing to risk everything for short term again, most of us aren't.

Great. Could have codified Roe, but you're happy with Texas' law as long as your precious Jim Crow filibuster keeps progress from ever happening on the national level.

Your real nightmare scenario isn't Florida's abortion laws. It's Washington's minimum wage, universal vote by mail, and legal cannabis.

Codified Roe = short term gain. The only way to codify it is to plant the seeds for its destruction. Along with the destruction of other laws you should care about.

Codified Roe = short term gain.

You prefer no gain at all ever. Congratulations on getting it.

I prefer incremental gains that are not easily reversed. Like the ACA and the latest climate change legislation.

You like the filibuster because you like your losses to be untempered by gains.

You're trying to coast on the ACA from 15 years ago, when the only thing you liked about it was how the filibuster prevented the public option from happening.

I like the filibuster because without it the ACA wouldn't have lasted 15 years.

If Republicans were willing to simply undo anything that Democrats put into place, why haven't they?

They could have ended the filibuster with a simple majority and done whatever they wanted any time they had a majority in the Senate. They won't, and it's not because of some non-existent worship of decorum. It's because they know that repealing popular legislation would be so unpopular that it would sink them.

Democrats just don't want to end the filibuster. It gives them a flimsy excuse to let Republicans dictate the limits of policy regardless of who has the majority.

Republicans don't want to end the filibuster for the same reason as Democrats: they are afraid Democrats will undo whatever they manage to pass.

And it's laughable to suggest that they are worried about unpopularity, they pass unpopular laws all the time. Literally book banning is unpopular. Six week abortion bans are unpopular. Tax cuts for the wealthy are unpopular. Republicans don't care, they only have to do things that are popular among conservatives.

Republicans don’t want to end the filibuster for the same reason as Democrats: they are afraid Democrats will undo whatever they manage to pass.

Sounds good. Maybe we should undo whatever Republicans pass. You don't want to do that either, of course.

Republicans already have their mechanism for undoing things Democrats like: the courts and red states. You'll happily let all of it go forever as long as Democrats have the only thing they care about: the Jim Crow Filibuster.

We've been going around in circles for some time now. You're determined to support a stupid racist policy that serves almost exclusively to prevent civil rights legislation from passing. I'm done with this conversation. Thanks for the confirmation that the Dixiecrats never completely left the party.

2 more...
2 more...
2 more...
2 more...
2 more...
2 more...
2 more...
2 more...
2 more...
2 more...
2 more...
2 more...
2 more...