Please recommend your cheaper, reliable SSDs 2TB+ (4TB ideal)fossilesque@mander.xyz to Selfhosted@lemmy.world – 52 points – 7 months agoTitle. :)49Post a CommentPreviewYou are viewing a single commentView all commentsShow the parent commentI thought that SSD fails “better” than HDD because SDD become read-only first.Only when they get to the end of life of the cells. If there's another failure before that, it's likely a full failure.Thanks. In that case is it known which of those two possibilities are most likely?To my knowledge, that isn't a consistent pattern (someone please correct if wrong).According to @postcard64 below I’m oversimplifying things (at minimum).
I thought that SSD fails “better” than HDD because SDD become read-only first.Only when they get to the end of life of the cells. If there's another failure before that, it's likely a full failure.Thanks. In that case is it known which of those two possibilities are most likely?To my knowledge, that isn't a consistent pattern (someone please correct if wrong).According to @postcard64 below I’m oversimplifying things (at minimum).
Only when they get to the end of life of the cells. If there's another failure before that, it's likely a full failure.Thanks. In that case is it known which of those two possibilities are most likely?
To my knowledge, that isn't a consistent pattern (someone please correct if wrong).According to @postcard64 below I’m oversimplifying things (at minimum).
I thought that SSD fails “better” than HDD because SDD become read-only first.
Only when they get to the end of life of the cells. If there's another failure before that, it's likely a full failure.
Thanks. In that case is it known which of those two possibilities are most likely?
To my knowledge, that isn't a consistent pattern (someone please correct if wrong).
According to @postcard64 below I’m oversimplifying things (at minimum).