We Asked A.I. to Create the Joker. It Generated a Copyrighted Image.
![](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/7c668ec0-a3ad-455f-b736-1f5f13808b09.png)
![](https://fry.gs/pictrs/image/c6832070-8625-4688-b9e5-5d519541e092.png)
![We Asked A.I. to Create the Joker. It Generated a Copyrighted Image.](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/898a2f4c-2d20-4b2c-9847-fc3dbcbef27a.jpeg?format=jpg&thumbnail=256)
nytimes.com
We Asked A.I. to Create the Joker. It Generated a Copyrighted Image.::Artists and researchers are exposing copyrighted material hidden within A.I. tools, raising fresh legal questions.
You are viewing a single comment
Asks AI to generate copyrighted image; AI generates a copyrighted image.
Pikatchu.jpg
It is a point against those "it's just like humans learning" arguments.
I mean if you asked a human to draw a copyrighted image you would also get the copyrighted image. If the human had seen that copyrighted image enough times they might even have memorised The smallest details and give you a really good or near perfect copy.
I agree with your point but this example does not prove it.