HP wants you to pay up to $36/month to rent a printer that it monitors
![](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/7c668ec0-a3ad-455f-b736-1f5f13808b09.png)
![](https://fry.gs/pictrs/image/c6832070-8625-4688-b9e5-5d519541e092.png)
![HP wants you to pay up to $36/month to rent a printer that it monitors](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/7495b5b3-10fe-402d-bfaa-6abc19dfb51d.jpeg?format=jpg&thumbnail=256)
arstechnica.com
HP wants you to pay up to $36/month to rent a printer that it monitors::"Never own a printer again."
You are viewing a single comment
HP wants you to pay up to $36/month to rent a printer that it monitors::"Never own a printer again."
$36/mo is 144 pages printed at my local library. If I needed to print that many pages, I'd get an enterprise MFP.
I had to print something yesterday... I submitted it to staples and went and picked it up.
Cost me $2
I expect that 10 pages will be all I'll have to print in 2024.
In the last 5 years I've spent less than $10 on printing.
If I had to actually print items.. I'd get a inexpensive brother laser printer
Last thing I had to print was in 2022, so I'm also content to just use printing services.
Not from HP, I hope...
Controversial opinion, but I like Kyocera's enterprise offerings. Xerox is always solid too.