What should we do about Threads?

NineteenDoornails@programming.dev to Fediverse@lemmy.world – 526 points –

A lot of people dislike it for the privacy nightmare that it is and feel the threat of an EEE attack. This will also probably not be the last time that a big corporation will insert itself in the Fediverse.

However, people also say that it will help get ActivityPub and the Fediverse go more mainstream and say that corporations don't have that much influence on the Fediverse since people are in control of their own servers.

What a lot of posts have in common is that they want some kind of action to be taken, whether it'd be mass defederating from Threads, or accept them in some way that does not harm the Fediverse as much.

What actions can we take to deal with Threads?

271

You are viewing a single comment

I'm going to recommend that if W3C starts accepting changes to the AP standard from Meta, the community must maintain a fork that rips out any offending parts.

The part that most concerns me is that meta is going to be able to use it's considerable influence to fuck with AP. Although, at this point I'm 50/50 on whether they even bother with federation.

The W3C has shown in the past that it can't be trusted not to take bribes. See alse: EME