Philosophy rulesgandalf_der_12te@feddit.de to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zone – 635 points – 7 months agoLink to Wikipedia article about it58Post a CommentPreviewYou are viewing a single commentView all commentsShow the parent commentActually, no, but I meant something very different from what I wrote hehe I will edit my comment, thanks!I see. I think wikipedia either forbids links to itself or at least it is against every conventionSounds reasonableAnd I think a word is never twice linked but only the first time it appears. So if "clicking" will occur a second time, it won't be clickable
Actually, no, but I meant something very different from what I wrote hehe I will edit my comment, thanks!I see. I think wikipedia either forbids links to itself or at least it is against every conventionSounds reasonableAnd I think a word is never twice linked but only the first time it appears. So if "clicking" will occur a second time, it won't be clickable
I see. I think wikipedia either forbids links to itself or at least it is against every conventionSounds reasonableAnd I think a word is never twice linked but only the first time it appears. So if "clicking" will occur a second time, it won't be clickable
Sounds reasonableAnd I think a word is never twice linked but only the first time it appears. So if "clicking" will occur a second time, it won't be clickable
And I think a word is never twice linked but only the first time it appears. So if "clicking" will occur a second time, it won't be clickable
Actually, no, but I meant something very different from what I wrote hehe I will edit my comment, thanks!
I see. I think wikipedia either forbids links to itself or at least it is against every convention
Sounds reasonable
And I think a word is never twice linked but only the first time it appears. So if "clicking" will occur a second time, it won't be clickable