Should it just be called JASM?onlinepersona@programming.dev to Programmer Humor@programming.dev – 152 points – 6 months agoSo much better now18Post a CommentPreviewYou are viewing a single commentView all commentsShow the parent commentActual assembly in mainstream use: x86 arm risc v mainstream byte code: jvm .net (I think) wasm fake assembly people may write: llvm wasm wat (web assembly text) is actually written is S-expressions, like lisp but without code as data. Edit: formatting.NET thing is called ILThe runtime is even called "common language runtime" (clr), as it is intended to support many different languages, which the jvm never was.Languages like F# or (God forbid) VB.NET
Actual assembly in mainstream use: x86 arm risc v mainstream byte code: jvm .net (I think) wasm fake assembly people may write: llvm wasm wat (web assembly text) is actually written is S-expressions, like lisp but without code as data. Edit: formatting.NET thing is called ILThe runtime is even called "common language runtime" (clr), as it is intended to support many different languages, which the jvm never was.Languages like F# or (God forbid) VB.NET
.NET thing is called ILThe runtime is even called "common language runtime" (clr), as it is intended to support many different languages, which the jvm never was.Languages like F# or (God forbid) VB.NET
The runtime is even called "common language runtime" (clr), as it is intended to support many different languages, which the jvm never was.Languages like F# or (God forbid) VB.NET
Actual assembly in mainstream use:
x86
arm
risc v
mainstream byte code:
jvm
.net (I think)
wasm
fake assembly people may write:
llvm
wasm
wat (web assembly text) is actually written is S-expressions, like lisp but without code as data.
Edit: formatting
.NET thing is called
IL
The runtime is even called "common language runtime" (clr), as it is intended to support many different languages, which the jvm never was.
Languages like F# or (God forbid) VB.NET