Far-right figures, including Nazi supporters, anti-gay extremists, and white supremacists, are flocking to Threads

MiscreantMouse@kbin.social to Technology@kbin.social – 1 points –
Far-right figures, including Nazi supporters, anti-gay extremists, and white supremacists, are flocking to Threads
mediamatters.org
41

You are viewing a single comment

Supporting free speech means allowing people you hate to talk too. Censor a Nazi one day, then the next day it's something your weird friend likes, then the next day it's something you like.

Everyone deserves a platform online, but they have to earn their audience. Censoring them is only going to make more people want to go to other platforms to hear and see what they have to say.

That's just common misconception. Free speech is there to protect people from the government, not business. If my anti-racism voice gets suppressed on Threads (assuming I ever make an account there) I'd just move to another platform.

And really, there's no good reason for a well-intended internet community to allow racism expand.

The right to free speech is drawn from a US constitutional amendment, which says the US government can't censor speech, but it has nothing to do with private platforms like this, much less individual responses to Nazi rhetoric. Nobody owes hate speech a free platform.

But these private platforms have a liability shield. If they have a liability shield, they shouldn't be allowed to censor things.

they shouldn't be allowed to censor things

I disagree, and so does US law. Abusive material shouldn't be spread just because it can be.

Illegal shit is already illegal. That's not what I was talking about.

You missed the point, but whatever, you don't get to force private platforms to host content, that's up to the owners.

It doesn't mean you have to give them the platform, though. If they want to create their own Nazi federation that's entirely on them, but you don't have to integrate their content.

If these companies are going to control what's on their platform then they shouldn't get a liability shield.

They're a bookstore censoring the content of the books they have in the store.

If you don't like what someone has to say online you don't have to click on their profiles or follow them or read what they're saying.