So now what distro are we running for LTS desktops?

Possibly linux@lemmy.zip to Linux@lemmy.ml – 48 points –

Ubuntu has too many problems for me to want to run it. However, it has occurred to me that there aren't a lot of distros that are like the Ubuntu LTS.

Basic requirements for a LTS:

  • at least 2 years of support

  • semi recent versions of applications like Chrome and Firefox (might consider flatpak)

  • a stable experience that isn't buggy

  • fast security updates

Distros considered:

  • Debian (stable)
  • Rocky Linux
  • openSUSE
  • Cent OS stream
  • Fedora

As far as I can tell none of the options listed are quite suitable. They are either to unstable or way to out of date. I like Rocky Linux but it doesn't seem to be desktop focused as far as I can tell. I would use Debian but Debian doesn't have the greatest security defaults. (No selinux profiles out of the box)

79

You are viewing a single comment

For a desktop I'd use Debian + Gnome (you won't get cutting edge on stable but it is not that important) and flatpack for most of the apps. Sincerely I don't see why selinux is so important on a workstation.

I find it interesting that people think things like selinux aren't important, but at the same time appreciate(?) the isolation in flatpak or wayland.

The reason I don't like selinux is that it's quite complicated.
I don't like flatpak, prefer wayland, but also apparmor, even if I haven't used that much yet.

1 more...