This is what you said which started this conversation:
I was just reading about it. It’s another web encyclopedia trying to incorporate other encyclopedias to compete against Wikipedia’s biases.
I showed you that the whole thing is about Wikipedia not having a right-wing bias.
I thought you cared about facts and truth?
I do. I admitted Justapedia was a biased source:
Edit: I read through the [page](https://justapedia.org/wiki/Fascism) on Fascism. It’s crap, runaway.
but the references linked were credible.
I’ll admit when I’m wrong, will you?
Five studies, including two from Harvard researchers, have found a left-wing bias at Wikipedia:
A Harvard study found Wikipedia articles are more left-wing than Encyclopedia Britannica.
Another paper from the same Harvard researchers found left-wing editors are more active and partisan on the site.
A 2018 analysis found top-cited news outlets on Wikipedia are mainly left-wing.
Another analysis using AllSides Media Bias Ratings™ found that pages on American politicians cite mostly left-wing news outlets.
American academics foundconservative editors are 6 times more likely to be sanctioned in Wikipedia policy enforcement. source
When did I say Wikipedia didn't have a bias? Please quote me.
Again, if you care about the truth, you'll show where I made that claim that you think you're refuting.
Maybe I misread it. I’m not concerned with winning an argument, only with correcting the misinformation about “ghost cities.” I did that. Now I just have to wait for Legoland Sichuan to open in 2025 in the new state-level are of Tianfu. Hopefully it won’t be too crowded, since it’s a “ghost city.”
"Maybe" you misread what?
I never claimed Wikipedia had no bias. I never even implied it.
You berated me for not caring about facts and truth, then you lied about me, now you won't even admit it was a lie.
I continually try to de-escalate, and disengage. And you continue to antagonize and misrepresent my intent.
Take a breath. I’m not worth the amount of energy you’re putting into this.
Well, it seems you don't actually care about facts and truth.
This is what you said which started this conversation:
I showed you that the whole thing is about Wikipedia not having a right-wing bias.
I thought you cared about facts and truth?
I do. I admitted Justapedia was a biased source:
but the references linked were credible.
I’ll admit when I’m wrong, will you?
When did I say Wikipedia didn't have a bias? Please quote me.
Again, if you care about the truth, you'll show where I made that claim that you think you're refuting.
Maybe I misread it. I’m not concerned with winning an argument, only with correcting the misinformation about “ghost cities.” I did that. Now I just have to wait for Legoland Sichuan to open in 2025 in the new state-level are of Tianfu. Hopefully it won’t be too crowded, since it’s a “ghost city.”
"Maybe" you misread what?
I never claimed Wikipedia had no bias. I never even implied it.
You berated me for not caring about facts and truth, then you lied about me, now you won't even admit it was a lie.
I continually try to de-escalate, and disengage. And you continue to antagonize and misrepresent my intent.
Take a breath. I’m not worth the amount of energy you’re putting into this.
Well, it seems you don't actually care about facts and truth.
Leave me alone. This is borderline harassment.