Ruledadarobot@lemmy.sdf.org to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zone – 222 points – 3 months ago20Post a CommentPreviewYou are viewing a single commentView all commentsI know this isn't true because we're not called the United States of FunkIt is actually true, just the portrait they've chosen for the article is highly stylized and didn't really look like him."Highly stylized" as in "an entirely different person"Well not entirely different. They're both named George.True. Someone needs to make a venn diagramThey also both had sons named George.
I know this isn't true because we're not called the United States of FunkIt is actually true, just the portrait they've chosen for the article is highly stylized and didn't really look like him."Highly stylized" as in "an entirely different person"Well not entirely different. They're both named George.True. Someone needs to make a venn diagramThey also both had sons named George.
It is actually true, just the portrait they've chosen for the article is highly stylized and didn't really look like him."Highly stylized" as in "an entirely different person"Well not entirely different. They're both named George.True. Someone needs to make a venn diagramThey also both had sons named George.
"Highly stylized" as in "an entirely different person"Well not entirely different. They're both named George.True. Someone needs to make a venn diagramThey also both had sons named George.
Well not entirely different. They're both named George.True. Someone needs to make a venn diagramThey also both had sons named George.
I know this isn't true because we're not called the United States of Funk
It is actually true, just the portrait they've chosen for the article is highly stylized and didn't really look like him.
"Highly stylized" as in "an entirely different person"
Well not entirely different. They're both named George.
True. Someone needs to make a venn diagram
They also both had sons named George.