Sexual dimorphism rule

Interstellar_1@lemmy.blahaj.zone to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zone – 615 points –
63

You are viewing a single comment

Oh, second comment: your framing is disengenuine.

These are scientists, I'm a scientist, we're held to standards of peer review and methodological scrutiny.

I don't need to establish how and whether we're doing science with authority-- that's the beauty of the invention of the scientific method. I also don't need to establish whether these are facts or opinions, because the body of research is so large and well-discussed, for decades now, that peer review has had plenty of time to do it's work.

To humor you-- the methods used have been all of the above: surveys, experiments, studies, etc.

To humble you-- it's extremely arrogant of you to ask a scientist, to their face, whether their research is real or just opinion. If you think all the research in this field is wrong, you can fix it the way we fix all our science: by conducting your own research and subjecting it to review by other experts in the field.

You compromised your integrity by jumping to a false conclusion to deal a quick shot at me. That earns me the right to question the validity of your stance. Don’t dish it out if you can’t take it back. Too much college can lead to feelings of superiority, but the true tell is how easy you are offended.

“…how easy your are offended.”

Says the person literally frothing at the mouth to say trans women aren’t women under a post about monkey noses.

Dude this image reinforces my point that male is different than females. Up your education level before taking on a topic you can’t fully appreciate.

This image of animated characters and monkeys proves that trans people aren’t real? 💀💀

Oh my god, I can’t handle how stupid you are.

How stupid I am? You can’t even read!

Stoneparchment gave you so much info and you comprehended none of it. Why would anyone engage with you seriously if you won’t return the favor?