Microsoft’s latest security update has ruined dual-boot Windows and Linux PCsobbeel@lemmy.eco.br to Linux@lemmy.ml – 555 points – 1 months agotheverge.com142Post a CommentPreviewYou are viewing a single commentView all commentsShow the parent commentI'm going to choose a VM.I’d almost bet money that in a year or two they’ll make it so that the latest version of windows cannot be installed in virtual machinesThat would break 90+% of installations then.That's when they "graciously" offer to whitelist "approved" devices to boot windows VM from.Then anyone running a Windows VM would just switch to a Server edition, which is almost exclusively run via a VM.I have a morbid curiosity to see that happen.Yes and
I'm going to choose a VM.I’d almost bet money that in a year or two they’ll make it so that the latest version of windows cannot be installed in virtual machinesThat would break 90+% of installations then.That's when they "graciously" offer to whitelist "approved" devices to boot windows VM from.Then anyone running a Windows VM would just switch to a Server edition, which is almost exclusively run via a VM.I have a morbid curiosity to see that happen.Yes and
I’d almost bet money that in a year or two they’ll make it so that the latest version of windows cannot be installed in virtual machinesThat would break 90+% of installations then.That's when they "graciously" offer to whitelist "approved" devices to boot windows VM from.Then anyone running a Windows VM would just switch to a Server edition, which is almost exclusively run via a VM.I have a morbid curiosity to see that happen.Yes and
That would break 90+% of installations then.That's when they "graciously" offer to whitelist "approved" devices to boot windows VM from.Then anyone running a Windows VM would just switch to a Server edition, which is almost exclusively run via a VM.I have a morbid curiosity to see that happen.Yes and
That's when they "graciously" offer to whitelist "approved" devices to boot windows VM from.Then anyone running a Windows VM would just switch to a Server edition, which is almost exclusively run via a VM.I have a morbid curiosity to see that happen.
Then anyone running a Windows VM would just switch to a Server edition, which is almost exclusively run via a VM.I have a morbid curiosity to see that happen.
I'm going to choose a VM.
I’d almost bet money that in a year or two they’ll make it so that the latest version of windows cannot be installed in virtual machines
That would break 90+% of installations then.
That's when they "graciously" offer to whitelist "approved" devices to boot windows VM from.
Then anyone running a Windows VM would just switch to a Server edition, which is almost exclusively run via a VM.
I have a morbid curiosity to see that happen.
Yes and