Kremlin could be 'nervous' as angry Russians send messages to Putin amid Ukraine counterattack

lemme in@lemm.ee to World News@lemmy.world – 361 points –
Putin is enraged as Ukraine suddenly decides to invade Russia. Here's the strategy behind the audacious move
abc.net.au

Angry Russians displaced after Ukraine crossed the border and invaded the Kursk region last week have vented their frustrations online to President Vladimir Putin.

The criticisms represent an unusually public show of defiance in a country where any cracks at the leader or military can draw harsh punishments.

53

You are viewing a single comment

I'm afraid you don't understand how the burden of proof works. I'd give you an easy link to understand it, but someone told me recently, "I'm not obligated to do a Google search for you."

If you can’t be bothered to spend 5 mins looking something up then you’re welcome to believe whatever you want.

This isn’t a court case, we’re having a conversation in an Internet forum. What you’re calling a “burden of proof”, I’m choosing to call intellectual laziness.

I’m choosing to call intellectual laziness.

Now that's some irony from someone who gets sentence-construction software to write posts on their behalf.

Are you incapable of grasping that the LLM wrote a total of like 3 sentences in a 3 paragraph comment?

And yea, the fact that you can’t seem to google 3 words and read a couple articles instead of being purposefully obtuse reeks of intellectual laziness.

Sorry, not sorry.

"I wasn't being lazy because I only used the lie machine a little bit."

Gotcha.

So you don’t have an actual argument, you’re just going to prop up the LLM strawman instead?

Is what I said wrong? Or are your feelings hurt because I used a tool to summarize something?

You are now flagrantly violating our incivility rule. If you wish to continue this discussion, do not violate it again. If you do not wish to continue it, that is fine.

Lmao, what authority do you hold?

So, calling out blatant logical fallacies is not being civil?

Ok buddy, you do you…

The authority of my being a moderator in this community.

This was the uncivil part:

Or are your feelings hurt because I used a tool to summarize something?

Please read the rules in the sidebar. Specifically, rule 5.

And that’s different from this in what way?

-"I wasn't being lazy because I only used the lie machine a little bit."

Practice what you preach.

That would have been after you had called me lazy, would it not? I was pointing out that you were doing what you were calling me. It was demonstrative.

Do you think it is wise to continue down this hostile path with me? I think you would do best to walk away before you do something you shouldn't.

Your argument is intellectually lazy, I stand by what I said.

I’m only mirroring your attitude friend, ban me if you want. Plenty of other places I can take my opinion. You would think as a mod you would want to foster participation in the community, and not get hung up on something so petty.

You came at me aggressively off the bat; if you can’t admit that, then we aren’t ever going to see eye to eye.

Screenshotting this whole thread.

I don't plan on banning you. But I will delete any further posts that violate the civility rule.

I never even suggested I would ban you.