OpenBSD has reached OpenBSD of Theseusrhabarba@feddit.org to Technology@lemmy.world – 122 points – 1 months agomarc.info10Post a CommentPreviewYou are viewing a single commentView all commentsShow the parent commentYes, it is, because it does the job. Why exactly shouldn’t they?For example, maybe branching is something you'd like to be able to do without it being a nightmare?OpenBSD seems to be able to have branches (CURRENT and STABLE), and they seem to be able to manage them just fine.
Yes, it is, because it does the job. Why exactly shouldn’t they?For example, maybe branching is something you'd like to be able to do without it being a nightmare?OpenBSD seems to be able to have branches (CURRENT and STABLE), and they seem to be able to manage them just fine.
For example, maybe branching is something you'd like to be able to do without it being a nightmare?OpenBSD seems to be able to have branches (CURRENT and STABLE), and they seem to be able to manage them just fine.
OpenBSD seems to be able to have branches (CURRENT and STABLE), and they seem to be able to manage them just fine.
Yes, it is, because it does the job. Why exactly shouldn’t they?
For example, maybe branching is something you'd like to be able to do without it being a nightmare?
OpenBSD seems to be able to have branches (CURRENT and STABLE), and they seem to be able to manage them just fine.