How Trump was 'orange-pilled' by three bitcoiners in Puerto Rico and the promise of $100 millionvegeta@lemmy.world to politics @lemmy.world – 213 points – 1 months agocnbc.com41Post a CommentPreviewYou are viewing a single commentView all commentsShow the parent comment This is not worth it. And yet you keep engaging, despite not even being the person I replied to in the first place. You’re asking me to explain why bitcoin supporters would support bitcoin? Of course not. Let me spell it out for you again: The person I replied to tried to use bitcoin supporters complaining about the Fed creating money as a gotcha. I explained how that doesn't land because: supporters of Bitcoin, which has a fixed supply, would obviously be critical of printing off more of a fiat currency. Then you called it bullshit, but have been incapable of explaining why that is. Instead choosing to shadow-box with made up arguments. So you’re saying that you do not prescribe to bitcoins approach? You believe that it’s all bullshit and are not saying the whole world’s financial systems are about to topple on a whim?So just shadow-boxing it is then. Carry on.I mean the shadow is pretty clear. You offer no substance.
This is not worth it. And yet you keep engaging, despite not even being the person I replied to in the first place. You’re asking me to explain why bitcoin supporters would support bitcoin? Of course not. Let me spell it out for you again: The person I replied to tried to use bitcoin supporters complaining about the Fed creating money as a gotcha. I explained how that doesn't land because: supporters of Bitcoin, which has a fixed supply, would obviously be critical of printing off more of a fiat currency. Then you called it bullshit, but have been incapable of explaining why that is. Instead choosing to shadow-box with made up arguments. So you’re saying that you do not prescribe to bitcoins approach? You believe that it’s all bullshit and are not saying the whole world’s financial systems are about to topple on a whim?So just shadow-boxing it is then. Carry on.I mean the shadow is pretty clear. You offer no substance.
So you’re saying that you do not prescribe to bitcoins approach? You believe that it’s all bullshit and are not saying the whole world’s financial systems are about to topple on a whim?So just shadow-boxing it is then. Carry on.I mean the shadow is pretty clear. You offer no substance.
So just shadow-boxing it is then. Carry on.I mean the shadow is pretty clear. You offer no substance.
And yet you keep engaging, despite not even being the person I replied to in the first place.
Of course not. Let me spell it out for you again:
The person I replied to tried to use bitcoin supporters complaining about the Fed creating money as a gotcha.
I explained how that doesn't land because:
Then you called it bullshit, but have been incapable of explaining why that is. Instead choosing to shadow-box with made up arguments.
So you’re saying that you do not prescribe to bitcoins approach?
You believe that it’s all bullshit and are not saying the whole world’s financial systems are about to topple on a whim?
So just shadow-boxing it is then. Carry on.
I mean the shadow is pretty clear. You offer no substance.