Misgendering does not ruleunlawfulbooger@lemmy.blahaj.zone to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zone – 599 points – 1 months agolemmy.blahaj.zone68Post a CommentPreviewYou are viewing a single commentView all commentsYes, but actually no. Using deadnames of companies is much more acceptable than for people.Despite what the Supreme Court will tell you, corporations aren't actually people, so you don't have to worry about dead naming them.Deadnaming is not necessarily misgendering. Sometime people have deadnames for reasons other than gender.
Yes, but actually no. Using deadnames of companies is much more acceptable than for people.Despite what the Supreme Court will tell you, corporations aren't actually people, so you don't have to worry about dead naming them.Deadnaming is not necessarily misgendering. Sometime people have deadnames for reasons other than gender.
Despite what the Supreme Court will tell you, corporations aren't actually people, so you don't have to worry about dead naming them.
Deadnaming is not necessarily misgendering. Sometime people have deadnames for reasons other than gender.
Yes, but actually no. Using deadnames of companies is much more acceptable than for people.
Despite what the Supreme Court will tell you, corporations aren't actually people, so you don't have to worry about dead naming them.
Deadnaming is not necessarily misgendering. Sometime people have deadnames for reasons other than gender.