Please don't post this on your campus.

ilex@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world – 356 points –

I started making generic library signs instead of visiting Reddit. I’m trusting you to not post them IRL.

There is an odd question that goes along with this one.

Edit: In the interest of not spamming the comm, here's "an otter one".

Edit: Whoops, missed a few.

38

You are viewing a single comment
View all commentsShow the parent comment

Oh, in a world of humanoid otters, are regular otters on leashes pets or pets?

Why not both

A v ~B = T
~A v B = T
 A v B = T
~A v ~B = F

I can't argue with that logic.

I don’t understand this but I can sort of understand seen by the calculations but I don’t understand. You’re cool :)

This comment is vertically long. Paragraphs and sentences are short.

There are two senses of the word "or." Inclusive and exclusive.

Inclusive | one, the other, or both
Exclusive | one, the other, but not both

In English, most instances are inclusive, like above. Exclusive might look like: Is the US President Joe Biden or not? Is that a square or circle, or neither?

I took you question to be you asking if the or was inclusive, but in a normal, funny way. The T/F statements define why 'both' can be an option. 'Both' might still be wrong factually, but logically, it's possible.

This style of logic is often called Boolean algebra. You'll see it often in programming and simple search engines. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Propositional_calculus

It is literally Logic 101 at most universities.

Look at us and monkeys. We evolved to suit our environment and overcome challenges that we faced. Monkeys didn't evolve because they didn't go out and face these things.

Edit: basically, we generally don't fuck the monkeys and anthropomorphic otters generally wouldn't fuck normal otters. I'd classify it as zoophilia.