Organic, huh?

Flying Squid@lemmy.worldmod to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world – 850 points –
77

You are viewing a single comment

Source?

The source is mass (internet) hysteria from 5 or 6 years ago. The above poster's claim is false and just silly given the slightest amount of scrutiny.

https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/taco-bell-grade-d-meat/

https://www.mashed.com/110654/truth-taco-bells-seasoned-beef/

Okay, I may have been wrong about TB. They did change their meat formulation about ten years ago (I remember the texture changed drastically, possibly as a PR move by TB when Alabama sued them in 2011).

Silica is a common food additive regardless. You can verify this yourself easily on Wikipedia.

While silcon dioxide is used as a food additive, and is found naturally in a lot of food, it's regarded as safe and even has been shown to have health benefits.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Silicon_dioxide

That's wildly different then the claim that Taco Bell was sued, and had to change formula, because they had so much "sand in their meat."

I didn't say it was unsafe. Just that we do eat sand.

And yes, I was wrong about TB. Their meat did change drastically in 2012 and I repeated a rumor as to why.

My point was just that the poster I was replying to does eat sand and that the organic label, while a misnomer, is far from meaningless.

No, but saying "TB was putting sand in their meat" is wildly misleading, when talking about silica as food additive.

Wikipedia silica and you'll see it's a common food additive.

Here's a paper on glyphosate in food. I read this yesterday to be sure I wasn't talking out of my ass. It's a bit dense but if you pick it apart basically cereal grains are the worst offenders.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8622992/