What language do you find the most seductive, and what about it makes you feel that way?WackyTabbacy42069@reddthat.com to Asklemmy@lemmy.ml – 75 points – 1 years ago87Post a CommentPreviewYou are viewing a single commentView all commentsShow the parent commentThis won't work, and it's called C++, and that's C, not C++.C is C++Well, actually, [no it isn't].(https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Compatibility_of_C_and_C%2B%2B) There are obviously lots of things in C++ that doesn't work in C, but there's also lots of stuff in C, especially from 1999 onwards, that isn't valid C++. Good to know. Thanks
This won't work, and it's called C++, and that's C, not C++.C is C++Well, actually, [no it isn't].(https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Compatibility_of_C_and_C%2B%2B) There are obviously lots of things in C++ that doesn't work in C, but there's also lots of stuff in C, especially from 1999 onwards, that isn't valid C++. Good to know. Thanks
C is C++Well, actually, [no it isn't].(https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Compatibility_of_C_and_C%2B%2B) There are obviously lots of things in C++ that doesn't work in C, but there's also lots of stuff in C, especially from 1999 onwards, that isn't valid C++. Good to know. Thanks
Well, actually, [no it isn't].(https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Compatibility_of_C_and_C%2B%2B) There are obviously lots of things in C++ that doesn't work in C, but there's also lots of stuff in C, especially from 1999 onwards, that isn't valid C++. Good to know. Thanks
This won't work, and it's called C++, and that's C, not C++.
C is C++
Well, actually, [no it isn't].(https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Compatibility_of_C_and_C%2B%2B)
There are obviously lots of things in C++ that doesn't work in C, but there's also lots of stuff in C, especially from 1999 onwards, that isn't valid C++.
Good to know. Thanks