That is some how cool and creepy all at once. I guess it gives a macro-view of what we consider attractive.
Not really. OP doesn't mention how they were generated, and how the pictures were selected.
It could just reflect the kinds of photos that went into the image generator, and the biases that were in its training data, unless the photos were chosen based on an attractiveness survey or some such.
Most of these look like the same person with different hair and makeup, so it could just be a very specialized network.
It gives a view of what whoever generated these images considers attractive.
That is some how cool and creepy all at once. I guess it gives a macro-view of what we consider attractive.
Not really. OP doesn't mention how they were generated, and how the pictures were selected.
It could just reflect the kinds of photos that went into the image generator, and the biases that were in its training data, unless the photos were chosen based on an attractiveness survey or some such.
Most of these look like the same person with different hair and makeup, so it could just be a very specialized network.
It gives a view of what whoever generated these images considers attractive.