Any of you ever played with IPFS?pastermil@sh.itjust.works to Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ@lemmy.dbzer0.com – 50 points – 1 years agoSeems quite promising! I heard it could use more maturing.22Post a CommentPreviewYou are viewing a single commentView all comments[This comment has been deleted by an automated system]That seems to be a pretty serious set of problems.[This comment has been deleted by an automated system]As a user, I don't want to share my downloaded images if people can use that to datamine my Lemmy browsing, so I wouldn't use it. Yes, instances could do the bulk of the sharing, but then that's just downloading and rehosting images with extra steps. Something like Veilid would be more interesting.[This comment has been deleted by an automated system]
[This comment has been deleted by an automated system]That seems to be a pretty serious set of problems.[This comment has been deleted by an automated system]As a user, I don't want to share my downloaded images if people can use that to datamine my Lemmy browsing, so I wouldn't use it. Yes, instances could do the bulk of the sharing, but then that's just downloading and rehosting images with extra steps. Something like Veilid would be more interesting.[This comment has been deleted by an automated system]
That seems to be a pretty serious set of problems.[This comment has been deleted by an automated system]As a user, I don't want to share my downloaded images if people can use that to datamine my Lemmy browsing, so I wouldn't use it. Yes, instances could do the bulk of the sharing, but then that's just downloading and rehosting images with extra steps. Something like Veilid would be more interesting.[This comment has been deleted by an automated system]
[This comment has been deleted by an automated system]As a user, I don't want to share my downloaded images if people can use that to datamine my Lemmy browsing, so I wouldn't use it. Yes, instances could do the bulk of the sharing, but then that's just downloading and rehosting images with extra steps. Something like Veilid would be more interesting.[This comment has been deleted by an automated system]
As a user, I don't want to share my downloaded images if people can use that to datamine my Lemmy browsing, so I wouldn't use it. Yes, instances could do the bulk of the sharing, but then that's just downloading and rehosting images with extra steps. Something like Veilid would be more interesting.[This comment has been deleted by an automated system]
[This comment has been deleted by an automated system]
That seems to be a pretty serious set of problems.
[This comment has been deleted by an automated system]
As a user, I don't want to share my downloaded images if people can use that to datamine my Lemmy browsing, so I wouldn't use it.
Yes, instances could do the bulk of the sharing, but then that's just downloading and rehosting images with extra steps.
Something like Veilid would be more interesting.
[This comment has been deleted by an automated system]