L2TP/IPTABLES: Routing ETH0 default traffic

Gandalf1783@feddit.de to Selfhosted@lemmy.world – 11 points –

Hey y'all,

I have my L2TP Client on my Raspi CM4 setup.

It should function as a VPN Gateway. It connects to my home network and enables clients connected to eth0 to reach devices at home.

In this case, I am using eth2 (my phone via USB tethering) to connect to the internet, to make sure no NAT issues or similar are occuring.

I can traceroute to our FritzBox (Router) which is sitting before the l2tp server (which is running on pfsense), meaning all of my home network is reachable through the tunnel.

vpngw:~# traceroute 192.168.178.1
traceroute to 192.168.178.1 (192.168.178.1), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets
 1  192.168.1.251 (192.168.1.251)  46.765 ms  46.553 ms  51.218 ms
 2  192.168.178.1 (192.168.178.1)  61.878 ms  61.784 ms  66.704 ms

There is also no issue to get to pfsense itself (192.168.1.251) (curl/ping).

Current interfaces on vpn gateway:

vpngw:~# ip addr
1: lo: <LOOPBACK,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 65536 qdisc noqueue state UNKNOWN group default qlen 1000
2: eth0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc mq state UP group default qlen 1000
    link/ether d8:3a:dd:07:da:4a brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
    inet 10.1.9.1/24 brd 10.1.9.255 scope global eth0
       valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
3: eth1: <NO-CARRIER,BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP> mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast state DOWN group default qlen 1000
    link/ether d6:eb:d2:ac:7a:c0 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
4: wlan0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST> mtu 1500 qdisc noop state DOWN group default qlen 1000
    link/ether d8:3a:dd:07:da:4b brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
5: vpnbridge: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST> mtu 1500 qdisc noop state DOWN group default qlen 1000
    link/ether 52:12:ec:25:25:ee brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
9: eth2: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast state UP group default qlen 1000
    link/ether 72:31:7f:86:2d:7e brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
    inet 172.20.10.2/28 brd 172.20.10.15 scope global dynamic noprefixroute eth2
       valid_lft 84939sec preferred_lft 74139sec
11: ppp0: <POINTOPOINT,MULTICAST,NOARP,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1410 qdisc pfifo_fast state UNKNOWN group default qlen 3
    link/ppp 
    inet 192.168.10.1 peer 192.168.1.251/32 scope global ppp0
       valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever

The iptables running on the vpn gateway:

vpngw:~# iptables -L -t nat
Chain PREROUTING (policy ACCEPT)
target     prot opt source               destination         
REDIRECT   udp  --  anywhere             anywhere             udp dpt:l2f redir ports 7331

Chain INPUT (policy ACCEPT)
target     prot opt source               destination         

Chain OUTPUT (policy ACCEPT)
target     prot opt source               destination         

Chain POSTROUTING (policy ACCEPT)
target     prot opt source               destination         
MASQUERADE  all  --  anywhere             anywhere

And the current routes:

vpngw:~# ip route
default via 172.20.10.1 dev eth2 proto dhcp src 172.20.10.2 metric 209 
10.1.9.0/24 dev eth0 proto kernel scope link src 10.1.9.1 
172.20.10.0/28 dev eth2 proto dhcp scope link src 172.20.10.2 metric 209 
192.168.0.0/16 via 192.168.1.251 dev ppp0 
192.168.1.251 dev ppp0 proto kernel scope link src 192.168.10.1

(These routes may not be correct, as in some were added due to trial and error, and therefore do not have any function)

IPTables has to redirect the 1701 L2TP port due to my routers settings, it just blocks those ports. Therefore I am running everything over Port 7331 and am rewriting this on my pfsense back to 1701. I have added the 3rd Route (192.168.0.0/16 over 192.168.1.251) to make my home devices reachable.

What I want to achieve: Clients connect on eth0 (10.1.9.0/24) can access the firewall and more local devices running at my house. However, they cannot connect to the internet. In my case, this does not need to happen over the L2TP VPN. This is why I left the default ip route on the vpn gateway, hoping all other traffic would just flow over the WAN of the gateway instead of through ppp0.

I currently dont have traceroute on the client (connected on eth0 with ip 10.1.9.10), so I cannot do one there. However, this is one from the vpngw with eth0's ip as a source address:

vpngw:~# traceroute -s 10.1.9.1 192.168.178.1
traceroute to 192.168.178.1 (192.168.178.1), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets
 1  192.168.1.251 (192.168.1.251)  35.315 ms  46.007 ms  45.905 ms
 2  192.168.178.1 (192.168.178.1)  55.449 ms  61.238 ms  61.131 ms

vpngw:~# traceroute -s 10.1.9.1 1.1.1.1
traceroute to 1.1.1.1 (1.1.1.1), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets
 1  172.20.10.1 (172.20.10.1)  0.851 ms  0.707 ms  0.820 ms
 2  * * *
 3  * * *
 4  * * *
 5  * * *
 6  * * *
 7  * * *
 8  * * *
 9  * * *
10  * * *
11  * * *
12  * *^C

As you can see, it cannot reach 1.1.1.1. The gw without any source address can reach it:

vpngw:~# traceroute 1.1.1.1
traceroute to 1.1.1.1 (1.1.1.1), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets
 1  172.20.10.1 (172.20.10.1)  3.731 ms  3.493 ms  3.334 ms
 2  * * *
 3  * * *
 4  * * *
 5  * * *
 6  * * *
 7  one.one.one.one (1.1.1.1)  31.162 ms  29.583 ms  32.708 ms
 8  one.one.one.one (1.1.1.1)  29.658 ms  29.678 ms  29.651 ms
 9  one.one.one.one (1.1.1.1)  36.693 ms  35.672 ms  36.714 ms
10  one.one.one.one (1.1.1.1)  38.520 ms  44.091 ms  37.902 ms
11  one.one.one.one (1.1.1.1)  62.050 ms  61.541 ms  48.789 ms
12  one.one.one.one (1.1.1.1)  48.346 ms  60.115 ms  54.037 ms
13  one.one.one.one (1.1.1.1)  53.662 ms  59.044 ms  58.985 ms

Whats the solution here? I am sure I missed some information about my routes. I left the default route, shouldn't the kernel route the incoming traffic to 1.1.1.1 from clients connected to eth0 over this? Do I have to define how to handle returning traffic (e.g. the packets are routed correctly, but the response is not arriving back at the client at eth0)?

Thanks for your help!

0

No comments yet. You could be first!