New rule regarding posting untagged game spoilers

Lilium@lemmy.mlmod to Gaming@lemmy.ml – 15 points –

The rule is: DON'T

if a game was released too recently, or worse yet, it's unreleased, use the Spoiler tag to wrap all the offending content in the body text, and don't type any spoiler into the title. Properly indicating there are spoilers inside the post is very recommend too. Oh, and as suggested by some people, major story spoilers from old games should be avoided as well!

What is "too recently"? Basically, use your common sense for this one. If you think there is still a lot of people playing the game for the first time, then that is a good indicator that you shouldn't be saying out loud that Darth Vader kills Dumbledore and things like that.

Thanks for your understanding.

Edit: and this new rule has already been edited, thanks everyone for the suggestions.

5

Please remember that not all Lemmy clients render the spoiler markdown correctly in the feed, and therefore spoilers may be seen anyway.

Over on c/formula1, we have a no spoilers rule in the post title, but given the above, we asked for the spoiler tags to be used as a courtesy.

I'd like to add that it would be nice to warn about spoilers about very old games too. I don't think that should be a rule, but just nice.

The whole "dude that game came out 30 years ago" argument doesn't make sense because not everyone plays everything (and not everyone has your age).

1 more...

Good rule. Spoilers suck. Personally I also think spoilers for old games stink as well, especially if you're a patient gamer. For example, spoiling the secret from Bioshock ruins the impact of the ending, no matter how old that game is.

Also just a reminder that Lemmy has spoiler tags as well (triangle with an exclamation mark icon), so if in doubt use them, like so:

::: spoiler spoiler Dumbledore did not have the high ground. :::

Thanks for the reminder, but that only works for text, right? If it works for images or anything else, then the NSFW tag won't be needed after all, but you got me wondering that now.

Edit: I mean, I might as well just try it out:

::: spoiler spoiler

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3 ::: I guess it will work with anything, thanks again, I will edit the rule to reflect that.