I thought it was an idea the entire Dem group was putting forth legislation on
They literally did not say that. Strawman. Fallacious.
I thought it was an idea the entire Dem group was putting forth legislation on
They literally did not say that. Strawman. Fallacious.
Moving the goalpost
"I'll ignore reality and assert my own delusions"
Okay. You know what.
I'm sorry for getting into this. This has been bad for me mentally. I don't think you actually blocked me, but you are in fact getting blocked. Holy. Fuck.
HOLY FUCK YOU ARE RIDICULOUS
IT'S ACCEPTABLE BECAUSE I WOULD AD HOMINEM ANYONE WHO IS FUCKING STUPID FOR BEING FUCKING STUPID
HOW DO I SEEM TO BE ENJOYING THIS I AM SIMPLY INFURIATED BY YOUR DELUSIONAL BEHAVIOR
if you hate me
Didn't say that. Putting words in my mouth. That's a classic strawman. Fallacious.
Holy fuck one second
Lol I despise people not knowing what a strawman is. Go back to english class.
You're pretty consistently putting words in people's mouths, moving goalposts, and just generally acting with intellectual dishonesty.
Genocide apologist.
Still voting blue.
You're still a genocide apologist.
Can you just argue like a normal person and not act delusional like some sort of gotcha?
edit: Like I'm pretty sure I don't even disagree with you for the most part but you're acting like a stupid person and using fallacious rhetoric lol
This is pretty brain dead of you. It's not a boogeyman, it's just reality.
I understand being angry at the current admin. I don't like Kamala either. I don't like the genocide. I disavow the genocide and I wish Israel's apartheid regime was dissolved.
Now let's face facts. The Trump admin did a lot of damage. And honestly, the Biden admin has allowed for a lot of damage to continue. And maintaining that honesty, I think the Harris admin will not be much better.
But this is absolutely a choice between an evil and a lesser evil, and to disagree with that? Fucking stupid. You want to make a difference? Too bad. Your vote isn't going to solve the genocide. Your lack of a vote isn't going to solve the genocide. Nothing you can legally do is going to solve the genocide.
If you want to do something about it, then you should. But if your idea of "doing something about it" is not voting for the democratic ticket... it isn't productive. Maybe spend that energy differently.
I live in a red state so I'm voting third party anyway. But if the alt right is allowed to proceed with project 2025, let's see how long we have before we are dealing with our own genocide, huh?
Wake up call: literally every admin has supported the wanton murder of civilians. Literally every admin has blood on their hands. Literally every admin is a war criminal.
Advocating for not voting for the Harris admin won't do anything about it.
I didn't debate whether or not genocide was happening.
It is genocide. There is no debate.
The genocide will get worse if Trump is elected. I am so glad that your conscious will be clear because you abstained from voting Blue. I am, again, also not voting Blue. Doesn't make your decision any less brain dead, and it doesn't make my point any less poignant. If you believe in harm reduction, then you should learn how to practice it.
I'm tired of arguing with a stupid person. It's genocide. You're not going to get a better candidate. I am dealing with reality. You are coping by opting out. Good luck. Hope Trump loses.
Don't think you understood the underlying point of their comment.
No paper would be published if it was biased and as selective as you say.
That is incredibly naive of you and truly points to your lack of credibility.
REMINDER: THIS IS WHERE WE STARTED
MY POINT = PROVEN CORRECT
PLEASE KEEP MOVING THE GOALPOST
lol ok bud
Recognize that you are trying to make a social point as you socially flail.
Silly goose. You don't know what you're talking about. But please do be armed and ready! I appreciate that much.
The paper wasn't retracted until 2010 lol. The point is that fraudulent papers can be published.
Still lmao.
This just shows the resilience of publishing, and the scientific community to fraud and [alleged] corruption
Uh... sure it does, buddy.
Don't think you understand what cognitive dissonance is. I understand the reality of the situation. Sounds like you're the one who doesn't.
Tell me more about how antivax scientists didn't successfully publish a paper with tons of biases and nonsensical findings.
More goalpost moving. Let's go back to the original argument about whether or not legislation is being pushed for, maybe?
Again, I agree with you for the most part lmao but you are doing such a bad job of coming off as intellectual. You straight up sound like someone who would get posted on r/iamverysmart.
Jesus christ.