don't be stupid.
don't be stupid.
The CCP is also very interested in all this
who cares about this? I mean if it's something he's still into yeah but teenagers will take lots of photos that are not to be taken seriously
If all cops ate seven grams of magic mushies I think the world would be a much better place for everyone who has to deal with cops
I'd say there is a huge amount of bots, then the smart bots, then the actual shills. The smarter ones run complex operations and are able to use their own power to self propel their own stories. And there are a lot of similar 'power users' who are not wholly paid for by someone but would do work for the highest bidder. I'd bet that yes, 50% of what's on the front page of major things is reputation management or Hail Corporate stuff, then I'd wager the mostly less popular stuff is actual people, with a ton of bad posts from all sides at the low popularity
that beyond brauts are pretty good actually
Do you agree that those who are tasked with upholding the law should be allowed to violate that same law with impunity?
I understand your comment but I don't see how it could overcome the above question in regard to police officers.
when the food has 2 days worth of sodium in it, you get thirsty. Many people don't drink enough water so then your thirsty and have your liter-of-cola and you can down it easily at that point
Rate those places online to warn others. fucking hailCorporate nonsense
and do you have one of those? Because form what I hear they beep when you're being a good drive too and you end up being a worse (than good) driver trying not to get the beeps
Do you have a written summary of that? I hate watching videos, and the dark forest book was fun but without a clue I don't understand the change to internet
Sounds like the CCP approach to twain with the "but a 'kingdom' in the past had this territory so we are entitled to it.
Yes, bring us the consensus engine
You mean 'native advertising'? that is something r/hailcorporate was pointing out for years, I wonder if it's been banned yet
I agree with the title statement. Why do I comment less? Articles much fewer?
But what is unique is the fact that we have an extremely well preserved corpus of text surrounding him.
IIFC all those writing are dated to well after the life time, like 100 year past it or so. It may be a bunch of written things but there is no/little reason to take those writings as anything but written down stories.
Ever play Telephone with a single word for 5 minutes? Now do that to a epic for 100 years, the end result will certainly be something but it may be nothing like the truth
I disagree in the sense that I think voting is useful but just up/down is not. A consensus engine that can judge each aspect of a statement alone and in a group can be used to find what is misleading, dishonest, and the like as well as what is simply untrue or lies.
can I just use the zester to get some of the acidic bite back into a fresh sqeeuzed thing?
Did they even contribute any meaningful technology discoveries or anything in the field?
We are not no, and look how well it is working. I get that doing things that is unfair is unfair but this point is to me more fair, not less.
The video isn't working and your words don't make sense General Jack D. Ripper : Do you realise that fluoridation - is the most monstrously-conceived and dangerous Communist plot we have ever had to face? this view was regarded as a fringe idea in the 60s
it looks like all these people would be ruining their whole careers by doing some of these things, I wonder if a standardly randomized IQ test and public results shoud be a thing for US public servents
the old subreddit r/aBetterWorld is an idea that would help you exactly in this instance if it were not just an idea
There is an idea that may help this, if it were built and then also used. it's a form of group decision making based on fluid data that solidifies as more data comes in.
One of the main aspects is that comments and things are compared to others to find how similar they are, something may present itself differently but be the same discussion. This method of identifying each 'argument' and 'rebuttal' goes hand in hand with declaring definitions so that conversations can't be flipped around by a bad actor. There's a big write up of the way it can be used to combat disinformation but as far as I know it's just the outline of how such a system would work, no one has built the system.
It's kind of similar to voting sites like reddit but goes a lot farther in defining ways things work, and works so ostracize trolls and the like. but as it would require something no one online would ever go for, being in one way 'tied' to your offline person, that I don't see it ever being a mainstream thing. Of course the accounts people would be using would be in no way identifiable unless selfdoxed they would still be like voter registration in that a real person had to be there once, and all things that person does online are here tied to them so that trolls and things show clearly over time. It's really designed to be mostly a niche discussion platform engine for people in the same hobby or interest.
hail emoji?
fuck all these 'tribalism' promotion posts, we should be finding ways to work together. Lisa, you're tearing me apart!