...I wonder if my girlfriend would let me feed her milk like this...
...I wonder if my girlfriend would let me feed her milk like this...
They were full sized tables but then Bobby dropped them
You should ask Trump, he is a stable genius
People who can afford 3000$ tickets can afford to take a day off to vote.
An extrapolation to say the government could clean up the city over night of homelessness because they were able to relocate a portion a few neighborhoods for an event.
I'd be down for Donald Glover
Big tummy bone
Can finally take my fish on a walk
I imagine them walking around like a dog in shoes, hah. Much better than losing a leg though! Truly A marvelous technology and glad he's OK.
We hooked up chatgpt to do code reviews so this is no longer a problem. The Children yearn for the stack
That's not what my orb said...
I do it to level up jumping. I jump over city walks and I'll jump over your whole character arc, idgaf I'm khajiit
Think they mean a Variational AutoEncoder
That boy ain't right
Archeologists: fascinating, it's a grocery list!
AI researcher: dangit this letter keeps demolishing my roc curve...
That doesn't sound right, but I don't know enough about futons to dispute it
You don't get the context of this joke
Half a year latre
You mess with the grocer, you get... exploser
Is this what the furries see... Yiff 🙃
The real wealth was in our 💕
!subscribe
Also they keep this data over time. This combination of device attributes at a certain location at a certain time is another way they can categorize you
You a bean counter?
Every web request costs someone money. If you aren't paying them you are being provided a service. They've given you knowledge/ material in their possession free of charge. You are taking advantage of that good will by using the content for purposes not intended. That is a moral failing.
To be clear the ownership of the material is not important, just the access is immoral, as the harm is already done.
Ill add the caveat that it can be moral if they've specifically told you you can via the websites robot.txt file which websites of consequence all have. But the assumption has to be they don't intend this because that is how consent works.
Because there is a standard way for people to make their consent known. Just because you ignore someone withholding you consent doesn't mean you are free morally.
Let's go!
Someone sees something picks out up then eats it
I forgot I had selected new.
That's exactly what robot.txt is... they spell out that they don't want you to access this site with an automated system.
One of us!
They need a hydro homie
Wow that's pretty good
Got stuck in the airport for a day , missed work and my boss got mad.
Worked at a spring factory, a laser manufacturer bought copper springs by the boat load because they'd melt I guess
This is not true. He has to pay before he appeals. It won't be relinquished until an appeal is settled though.
That would probably be more expensive than just paying companies. But it is morally different because a human did visit their website so their good will was not violated as they expressed this consent when they published the website.
You asked if it's moral, this is irrelevant
Yes I agree your use style could be immoral based on the agreement your transaction specifies. But if you've agreed your payment is to access their material then you have consent.
For everyone with a peloton, you can flash the bike with an aftermarket software.