Agree with the first half, but unless I'm misunderstanding the type of AI being used, it really shouldn't make a difference how logically soud they are? It cares more about vibes and rhetoric then logic, besides I guess using words consistently

No, Gen z covers people as young as 11 or 12, which is a good guess for "kids on Instagram"

Not necessarily a bad idea, but most the spam I've seen is from new accounts on larger instances, so I'm not sure it'll help with this.

Source:xkcd

Do we have a rule against just straight-up ads? If not, should we make one maybe?

Hello from Lemmy! Can you see this or do I need to @ you?

And we see the post, but I don't think it has a title.

Eta: @uhrbaan@mastodon.social?

Edit2: it's a title now!

He'll be clocking a lot of overtime this month.

That's the part that gets me. If it were just not removing content, well, I'd probably still complain but they'd have a coherent freedom of speech argument. But... they have to pay Nazis to make Nazi content and take a cut, otherwise it's censorship and that somehow helps the Nazis?

That sounds like it punishes small instances... a lot. What would starting an instance look like? Do you start with a huge list of servers to inspect and approve?

That's really the entire article. "Yeah, for now its run by hippies who care about privacy and run servers out of a sense of civic duty, but we can fix that"

Watch me engage with someone

For anyone else who's curious, it's a google-able question, and closer to 80%

https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2020/10/26/what-the-2020-electorate-looks-like-by-party-race-and-ethnicity-age-education-and-religion/

Tbh I'm struggling to imagine what this would look like in something like Lemmy. It seems to be describing an extreme form of setting your account to private, but this only really makes sense in a situation where you have followers who are friends and family. How would I decide who to "approve"?

I think these are great rules, so long as they never have any teeth.

I mean, they're doable, but they're cultural goals, not technical ones.

I'd argue that really all of these are on a spectrum between the two though.

Oh you're right, I read that as 490,000, sorry. Thanks

Any community recommendations?

I mean if you're trying to learn to be a competent handyman or build a bookcase maybe yeah, but I just need a screwdriver set for like 30 minutes to put something together.

What are you searching for? I can't remember the last time I googled something and most the results were malicious.

Also, I don't think it'll be easier to spot bullshit coming from an LLM then a website.

@mods I went with "spam or abuse", is that the appropriate label?

OK, but what arithmetic?

Where did those numbers come from? MAU/users ismore like 25%?

Well, you're commenting on a Mastodon post...

But that really says more about the user then the tech. This issue here isn't that the tech has too many errors, it's that stores use it and it alone to ban people despite it having a low but well known error rate.