It's vulnerabilities month or what?

Nowadays with WSL Windows is pretty good. Pretty much anything you can do on Linux you can do on Windows.

Now, not being worse is not really a point towards Windows. For developers its absolutely not worth it tanking the horrible storage performance, preinstalled ads and handing your soul to Microsoft for the privilege of not being worse than native Linux.

I'm loving that new activities indicator! way better than just saying "activities"

They just want money

Fedora is fantastic, but I'm a little shaken about Redhat, which is downstream of Fedora and a big supported.

Also, Fedora is a bit annoying with codecs and non-free software in general. They are extremely anal about not infringing copyright.

I would go for Vivaldi or ungoogled chromium

I love Zotero so much. It's way better than Mendeley

It works, nowhere near as good as AMD but it works.

No joke that would be great for privacy and putting users first. Users would go the product to the customers and the platform would actually need to cater to them.

The same would happen with Twitter.

Now, social media depends on its massive size, so even if makes the platform more user-centric, it would reduce the amount of users and reduce its value.

AVIF is supported everywhere and it's fantastic

I love Fedora! but sadly I have been burned twice by Red Hat already. I refuse to be burned a third time so I'm moving my servers over to Debian. I like to use the same ecosystem on all my computers, so I also moved my desktop and laptop over to Debian.

I tried OpenSUSE a few times, but I disliked YaST, disliked the unclear future of Leap and disliked the unclear future of ALP. I thought I would love Aeon (I used Silverblue when I used Fedora) but I didn't like being unable to compare my system against a "base" one. So for the time, at least until the situation over SUSE clears up, I'm going to stick with Debian.

Anyways, once GNOME 45 hits Debian Testing I think I'm going to move over to that, I would prefer to use Stable (which I use on my laptop and job) but I really want a recent GNOME for my Nvidia GPU. I have a bunch of BTRFS snapshots ready to go back to stable at any moment if anything happens, so I'm not too worried.

While I think firewalls are overrated, they are also dead easy to set up, and the best kind of defense is defense in depth.

First, I have a multi monitor setup, with different resolutions, refresh rates and scalings, so X11 is basically unusable (tears like crazy and wrong sizes everywhere). On Wayland, Wayland programs work perfectly, always looking crisp and the correct size.

Anyways, nearly everything I do is in a browser or a terminal, both work perfectly on Wayland. The other program I use lots is VSCode, which in the past was its own source of problems for Wayland/Nvidia, but now it surprisingly works fine (as long as I launch it with --ozone-platform-hint=auto so its not blurry).

I do use lots of these fancy electron apps, things Slack, Discord and Teams, but I sandboxed all of them into my browser. Teams barely works, but it barely works anywhere anyways so I'm not missing out on much.

I also use lots of native GTK apps, they all support Wayland perfectly, I really like the Celluloid video player for example.

The only programs I commonly use that are X11 only are Spotify, which I don't really care if its blurry (I tried sandboxing it too into the browser, but I like to keep all my music downloaded) and Datagrip, which I'm anxiously awaiting for Wayland support.

Is RCS encrypted? I still prefer signal above everything else. Whatsapp seems to be passable privacy wise, but it's Facebook so I don't trust it one bit.

One way or another, Whatsapp is the standard around the world and it for sure beats SMS.

Well so can you install Linux on Windows, Windows on macOS, Windows on Linux, macOS on Windows and macOS on Linux.

From that point of view, all OSs are identical (and to be fair, they pretty much are, nearly everything runs on a VM called 'web browser' already).

Did you add Flathub or rpmfusion? the store without those things is kinda barren

I went for an AMD APU on my laptop explicitly because I wanted to avoid hybrid graphics. While I would like a faster igp, for battery life and ease of use, APUs are fantastic.

It says it? TIL

I knew about that (kinda intuitively, openSUSE installer behaves the same way and I just assumed that Debian would be the same)

I tried a bunch of terminals on my laptop and ended up deciding that I don't care and just like the GNOME terminal.

I'm going to try Console on my desktop then!

Is that on X11 or Wayland?

When my main PC had Nvidia I was desperate to move from Xorg to Wayland because Xorg was laggy like that video you showed while Wayland behaved perfectly.

I think that only happens on Xorg if you have different monitors though.

My brother is the kind of people that installs stuff without reading a single option, just 'next next next' until the installer closes.

I'm personally waiting for utf-64 and for unicode to go back to fixed encoding and forgetting about merging code points into complex characters. Just keep a zeptillion code points for absolutely everything.

I downvoted because I'm a hater /s

NTFS is by far the worse filesystem commonly used nowadays. Even Apple has a better filesystem.

When using Windows the thing I miss the most is instant copies. Everyone else has them and they are incredibly handy.

In fact, with a CoW filesystem Microsoft could even circle around the disaster that is Windows update without needing to remake their entire OS.

Windows had a fantastic UI but I despise the changes they have made to it.

A bottom bar showing all your windows? fantastic! windows are such a core component of the OS that it sure looks like the OS was named after them right? So why in the world would closed programs, with no windows appear there? why would multiple windows fuse into a single icon?????

I was fine with just not pinning programs and setting the task bar to "never combine", but they literally removed the option with Windows 11. I really don't understand why Microsoft is de-emphasizing the 'windows' part of Windows. Apparently 'never combine' is coming back at some point to 11, so that's good.

Now, I'm not going to compare the Windows UI to Linux DE's since there are many alternatives that may or may not fit someone better.

As for hardware compatibility, I would say its a mixed bag on both directions. I moved my laptop from Windows to Linux when it started bluescreening when waking up from sleep. It works fine on Linux.

Sure, you have some WiFi cards that don't work out of the box on Linux. But they don't work out of the box on Windows either, you need to install the drivers on both OSs manually so its not any better.

Then you have some computers where Linux works like ass and can't sleep, and you got some computers where Windows works like ass and can't sleep.

The only solid arguments against Linux nowadays is

1. Programs don't run.
2. The Windows display stack is vastly superior, VRR, HDR and fractional scaling all working fine for a long time already where Linux is barely beginning to figure them out.