"Critics said they feared the new step would end up harming the fossil fuel industry."
I feel like that's kinda the point here.
"Critics said they feared the new step would end up harming the fossil fuel industry."
I feel like that's kinda the point here.
Do you have sources for this claim?
I think the bigger problem is that there are only two parties. Having the biggest party lead the house wouldn't be as big of an issue if they were still a minority of the total collection.
If we're doing npv, can we go a step further to ranked choice please? Npv is better than EC but falls into the same two party pitfalls.
I can't see a duck!
Can I come to your party,? Maybe drink some of your blood? Idk #justsillythings?
I think the technical term is: But muh ecomnomie!
It says you don't HAVE to sleep, not that you're unable to sleep.
Working... Slow 🥺
Yeah I'm only working till I get an inheritance from a mysterious relative. It is short term!
3rd party candidates still don't have a chance because they "can't get the votes" Ranked choice is basically npv, but I can have my first choice be the person I don't think will have enough, then fall back to the big parties as necessary.
Netflix, video calls and looking at old pictures is the impression I got.
I mean technically it will be the dark side of the moon. It'll just be the same side we normally see. A super fast new moon if you will.
Assuming 10% of 100,000 is 10k divided by 18 stores is 555 customers each. If everyone only goes once a year, and theyre all open 5 days a week, they still each have 2 customers per day
It depends, if they're spending say... $60 each? That's enough to pay a minimum wage employee at least. Also remember these are conservative numbers I've made up. It's likely that people visit more than once per year, sometimes spend more, sometimes spend less exc.
Take this one step further and make it into so many bank accounts, they're free after all!
One bank account for only the things you know don't change each month (rent, insurance exc)
Another account for things you can estimate each month (house gas, electricity exc)
I like another account for things like groceries and car gas after that, I find there a bit less predictable than things like electricity.
A few savings accounts for emergencies, trip planning, exc.
Finally one account for fun money to spend each month.
The beauty comes when you set them all up for automatic transfer and bill pay and only have to think about most of it once or twice per year!
I'd also recommend something like my "Splay" shoes if you're going to try it. They're barefoot shoes that also have a wide toebox so that your shoes fit your toes instead of your toes fitting your shoes!
Before I switched to the wide toebox I also used boating shoes if you find some of those cheaper.
Things like converse are of course more mainstream, but at least have the "zero drop" aspect, so you're closer to the ground but don't quite feel the ground.
Everyone will say barefoot is bad for your knees, but that's really only true if you're running or jogging on concrete without letting your body adjust.
My feet used to ACHE at the end of the day, now they can still hurt sure, but it feels much more like a tired muscle instead of incorrect exercise if that makes sense.
My new favorite planet
Can I "combine" those communities? What about duplicate posts across communities? For example, there's likely to be multiple gaming communities, i don't mind subscribing to multiple, but I don't want to see the same posts from both. Alternatively, if one gaming community "wins" - basically becomes default: then what? Sounds like we'd be reliant on whoever owns that community again.
That's really more a bar on state religion, that again doesn't really prevent our new speaker from say proposing a bill that donates Federal funds to his favorite church, so long as the government isn't in control of said church.
None of that says that church and state must be separate, just that there can be no religious test. There's nothing in there barring him from saying "I think God blesses the people here"
In fact, to really be edgy, that also doesn't prevent the government from say donating $10B each year to some Christian church.
To your second point, I never suggested that the Constitution says we should base our laws around the Bible.
My only point is the oft quoted Separation of church and state is only an idea from the Jefferson papers. If you want to make sure church and state remain separate, and the new speaker doesn't start using federal funds for his church, perhaps it's time to actually put separation into the Constitution?
Ok, show me where it says that then
In before this feature is discontinued by Google.