Yeah but how much for 4?

Wish I could tell you, buddy

Ignoring its existence is spitting in the mouth of pragmatism, and not in a good way

bash: fewer: command not found

In that case you wouldn't have gotten the security part and your time and, maybe, money would have been lost, but you not having this certificate, ironically, demonstrates you learned enough

#2. Use a VPN. Mullvad is great but they recently removed port-forwarding so if you care about port-forwarding I recommend going with something like ProtonVPN (paid).

#3. Bind your VPN to your torrent client. (I recommend using QBittorrent)

Maybe before suggesting these two, which are more go-to than they should be, you should have suggested checking their national, cultural and legislative view on piracy and, if at least two result positive, should have suggested to search for websites that are totally shady but look good and work better, that host downloadables either via torrent or direct downloads. Many nations have their own.

Feel free to consider the above as #2 and then go from there, my bud PRUSSIA_x86

AFAIK tor wouldn't be able to handle regular streaming of 4k movies, constant sending/receiving of e-mail, downloading of AAA videogames and uploading porn 1080p/60fps. Tor is an instrument which has its purpose. It's like saying stirring tea with a screwdriver should be normalized.

Just curious what you're up to, bud

Would pay to see it in its used-fruity-sharp-condom phase

Water is like the best environment there is for microorganisms.

The existence of grog confirms it 🫵

Have you tried complaining to the hottest tech support employee at your company?

Hope folks will actually stick to claims such as this when the time comes

So does china

Wait. Wasn't Glenn battered to death?

"I ain't like all the others"

How about the good old Danny Trejo?

I understand. Just saw some similarities and thought of the worst. I repeat: I trust Mozilla (non-profit) muuuuuch more than I trust Google (for-profit), for example, but still not enough to exclude doubt. I personally like this quality in me, but I can see how, sometimes, it may lead to a misunderstanding like this post right here. Just wanted to have some external opinion on this, and make people who didn't notice it notice it.

Make sure the OP provides you with a binary first

Whatever you want, man, that's the trick

Bummer

Aren't you?

What is the perceived problem, then?

Make sure to read this thoroughly this time.

[...]it's almost always a manufactured limitation.

Doesn't that sound like a good description of a problem?

I think I've only ever encountered a single website that didn't actually technically work on Firefox[...]

There's gonna be a hell of a lot more of them, buddy. You're gonna have to hang your cat on your balcony to get an estimate of future weather if you want to avoid using one of them how-are-these-even browsers.

Imagine yourself as a homosexual man in Iran (should be easy). Would you say that hiding that big part of you from everyone and even go as far as marrying a woman you don't even like just not to arouse suspicion makes the problem disappear? Just the fact that you need to spoof your useragent to view a shitty website, the developer of which would (should) die under a car one day 🤞, is a solid proof that you will soon be that homosexual man in Iran.

Doesn't solve the problem tho, which makes editing the useragent nothing but a temporary solution not worth being smartass-megamind about

Now there's that print monitor that's on by default, and can only be shut up by using a command line. Wtf? In the 21st century?

Lemme get your russian immigrant wife to setup that VR headset for you, so that you can disable any process you like like it's Jarvis

Edit: Care to point to my wrongs?