HM05

I’m wondering why this hasn’t been addressed yet. There were posts last night asking about it that have since been removed. There should be some post explaining the incident and what actions are being taken. But, there definitely needs to be additional action taken to prevent this going forward.

It’s fake, mon.

I’m curious what the frequency of these types of balloons are and if it’s increasing or we’re just more focused on them. There were supposedly some tweaks to sensors last year that started to include balloons and other objects that would have been previously filtered out as noise in the data. So, they’re at least probably getting detected more often. If it’s a matter of being more focused on them, then I wonder what risks they’re concerned about.

Wondering that too. I love how many people contributed to that article with so little content.

“I also propose that we put a warning on all horseradish that clearly states that if you ingest an entire bottle, that you will blow out your sphincter. Also, if anyone knows anyone that recently died with an intact size 3 sphincter, please contact me as I am currently very low on the waiting list for a donor.”

• Stan Smith

The amendment gives departments a 25 year window for releasing information and still allows for info to be withheld from the public over national security. The information would also reviewed by an appointed committee and wouldn't just be blindly released to the public.

I came here to link exactly that article. It's always important to do a little digging and verify claims before latching onto them, but people are embracing Kirkpatrick's claims without a second thought. It's easier for people to focus on one claim that supports their preexisting beliefs than to consider they may be wrong.

Whether or not any UAP come from some non-human origin, the government itself (including Kirkpatrick) has admitted there are unknown objects that don't match any known technology. If they could apply a label of even potentially being a drone, plane, or balloon, they would do so as they have done before. At minimum, it's a failure on the DOD to monitor our airspace. Just last year, the US engaged with and fired missiles at still publicly unknown objects over our airspace. However, Kirkpatrick is basically dismissing his former role as a waste of resources just because they can identify most (not all) reports.

They don't even account for it within the government. They have failed their 6th consecutive audit. The issue isn't that the public doesn't know where the funds are going, it's that not even Congress knows how the money is being used.

I've been watching a lot of SG-1 recently and Kinsey always frustrates me, mostly because I could picture him being a real politician.

Are you suggesting that the DoD should operate with no oversight and be allowed to fail their audits every year? I understand a breakdown in trust with politicians, but there needs to be some accountability.

He's still in a potentially relevant role. It seems that he immediately moved on to a role at Oak Ridge National Laboratory as Chief Technology Officer for Defense and Intelligence Programs. They do handle government contract work, so no telling if they have any projects that would benefit from his statements. I'm not one to delve into alleged government UAP programs, though I've seen Oak Ridge mentioned a lot. They have a lot of unique programs that are bound to stir curiosity.

Also, AARO didn’t even have a website until August 31 2023. Sean Kirkpatrick admitted to speaking with people like David Grusch prior to officially starting his role. But, since these didn’t go through official reporting channels they never got reviewed. DOD even released a report admitting to failing at documenting UAP.

The music lived up to the band’s name. Their songs are great, but I can feel really tense listening to them. Frankie Teardrop really encapsulates that feeling with the dark tale it tells, the screams, and droning music. Definitely recommend, but I can see it being off-putting to many.

If such programs exist, other countries may not want to show their hand if they know they trail behind the US. Sightings themselves could always be concealed due to national security concerns. Then there's just the possibility of lack of interest or negligence in documenting UAP.

As long as we don't combine the two topics. I'm not quite ready for alien sex researchers.